Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:19:50 -0500

I only did one big "industrial" job  (a tractor company) that I can think of
and I had a Norman 200C on camera just like I'd shoot an event... Brought a
tripod but didn't use it. As I was raining they tried to cancel it out. Mud
everywhere. I got the shot of the guy with the sparks  flying all over the
place they were happy. Made big bucks.
Would have loved to have a Hasselblad Super wide (38mm Biogon) for the
occasion. I'm getting a bare bulb head with cord for the thing. I use it
with a PocketWizard? for it so it does not blow up my various digital
cameras.


On 1/1/13 1:40 AM, "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:

> I would beg to differ, In the film days, I used a Hasselblad hand held in
> refineries and chemical plants with no problems. Even worse, when I worked
> for the airplane factory, we shot with RB67's hand held. That was indeed
> cruel and unusual punishment. Were I a dilettante out shooting landscapes 
> on
> my own time it would be entirely different. I've know a lot of wedding
> shooters that used a Hasselblad handheld exclusively. That camera is easy 
> to
> use hand held without a special grip, unless using flash.
> 
>> Medium format to me for such stuff means you're on a tripod.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photography
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)
In reply to: Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a "pro-hobbyist" evaluates an M9 . . . ICK)