Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120
From: gerry.walden at me.com (Gerry Walden)
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:34:11 +0000
References: <BLU155-W6412654A7CDE5EDC2D9E108D130@phx.gbl> <9C1BFB2C-181D-45A2-B558-1462A5AA07A0@sfr.fr> <CAH1UNJ2CP6ONuPTeDAbRfuJTEyueWe7fY0q_LNaoBw3w6xuoeQ@mail.gmail.com> <91570A12-7D91-47E5-AA05-FE0D974887C0@bex.net> <CAH1UNJ1tGddvZAYLQaKvd9P7kr1nV1S95ecQc8Qz0vUFWkXmww@mail.gmail.com> <D0C54CBF-F6FC-4104-A2A1-1216B9C361C9@icloud.com>

I would personally not touch that lens again. Mine was one of the worse 
lenses I have ever used. On the matter of name calling, do you mind taking 
your personal animosities off-lsit.

Gerry

Gerry Walden
+44 (0)23 8046 3076 or
+44 (0)797 287 7932
www.gwpics.com

On 19 Jan 2013, at 11:30, David English <daveenglish at icloud.com> wrote:

> I had the same experience with that lens and the one that preceded it. A 
> nice zoom range but soft images. My 28-70 2.8, heavy as it is never 
> disappoints.
> David
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jan 18, 2013, at 8:18 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> I hated that lens, could not get a decent result either on the D700 or
>> D800E for the most part, most shots were soft and had an unfocused look
>> about them - might have been an individual bad specimen, I don't know. I
>> bought it seduced by the focal length range - it struck me as ideal for
>> street photography. Sold it a marginal loss and went back to my old 24-85
>> and am quite happy with it on both bodies, as well as the weight, so will
>> stay with that for the time being. Have not tried the new 24-85 at all -
>> the AFS 24-70 f2.8 is great with the D800E, but too heavy for walkabout
>> photography.
>> Cheers
>> Jayanand
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Howard Ritter <hlritter at bex.net> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Jayanand?
>>> 
>>> May I ask what you didn't like about that new 24-120?
>>> Other than the size, weight, and being less sharp toward the corners at
>>> all focal lengths than the new (non-gold-banded) 24-85?
>>> 
>>> ?howard
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 17, 2013, at 11:22 PM, Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I generally check out all lenses for at least a couple of hours of use
>>>> before I buy - the only one I bought on impulse recently, without
>>> testing,
>>>> the Nikon 24-120 f4 ended up being resold in a couple of months. There
>>> is a
>>>> lesson there...(-:
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Jayanand
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:02 AM, philippe.amard <philippe.amard at 
>>>> sfr.fr
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The last two lenses I bought came from local  street shops, Phalsbourg 
>>>>> &
>>>>> Metz :-)
>>>>> And the last 2 cameras from the local FNAC.
>>>>> I find it so frustrating when you can't manipulate the gear prior to
>>>>> punching the PIN code
>>>>> 
>>>>> Amiti?s
>>>>> Philippe
>>>>> 
>>>>> Le 17 janv. 13 ? 17:58, Jean-Michel Mertz a ?crit :
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've read most of the posts concerning ebay and its potential dangers.
>>> I
>>>>>> think I might have an idea. I have been using one single lens (the
>>>>>> collapsible elmar 50) for a number of weeks now (+ M8)  and I have
>>> come to
>>>>>> the conclusion that this pair covers most of my needs. I do have
>>> another
>>>>>> lens (sum 35 asph) but I seldom use it. I think this is probably
>>> something
>>>>>> many other luggers experience, this successful match between a photog,
>>> a
>>>>>> body and a lens which often results in wonderful pictures being made.
>>> See
>>>>>> the use HCB made of his IIIg + 50mm. So, do we really need to have 
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> many lenses and cameras since we all have our favourite gear? (I'm of
>>>>>> course not talking of professional photogs!)Just an idea to beat ebay
>>> and
>>>>>> perhaps favour our local dealer - once every five years, for used and
>>> less
>>>>>> expensive gear!Jean-Michel
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
>>> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for more information
>>>>> 
>>>>> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible to
>>>>> the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<
>>> http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for more information
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120)
Reply from jkfyao at gmail.com (Joseph Yao) ([Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120)
In reply to: Message from j2m46 at hotmail.fr (Jean-Michel Mertz) ([Leica] a modest contribution to the best way to beat ebay)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] a modest contribution to the best way to beat ebay)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] a modest contribution to the best way to beat ebay)
Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120)
Message from daveenglish at icloud.com (David English) ([Leica] (Now) Nikon 24-120)