Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/01/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thanks, Marc, I think the cropped version has more power. David Sent from my iPad On Jan 23, 2013, at 1:22 AM, Marc Dufour <foto at marcdufour.net> wrote: > Ted, George > > Well, clearly expressed, my friends! > The fact: first I saw the bright green patch, and later the fine details > and tiny structures. > The matter: when travel I usually just take 3 lenses with me: 21-35, 35-70 > and 70-210, the one used is in this case. > In other circumstances, the Apo-Macro 100 would have been my choice, for > sure. > Even so, I still think the first version has the merit to site the item in > its context, without minimize the appealing center of the > image... > Next time, I'll take more lenses :) > Thanks a lot for your opinion!. > Cheers, > Marc > _______________________________________________ > > Mosses, lichens and eucalyptus cropped. > > http://tinyurl.com/bcu8cnb > Any opini?n about? > Cheers, > _______________________________________________ > > Hi Marc, > I like this tighter version much better. > > However? My gut feeling is because it is a lichen or moss to get thr real > visial impact maybe it requires a "macro?" kind of image. > > There seems lots of "tiny elements" that wouuld increase the impact of the > image if a macro type photo. I still think that's how > your "vision was being affected" by all the tiny bits. > > But then it's your photo and how you saw and felt it through the the > camera? > cheers, > ted > > _______________________________________________ > > I do prefer the tighter view? > a lot? > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information