Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Technical detail--why? - Steve
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 07:38:53 +0100
References: <1FAEC7E9-142F-40DF-BB4C-AECAA40CEDF9@frozenlight.eu> <EB1CAE194A1E4FFCBB91ABB648C39D80@syneticfeba505> <CABNC8SpzNgU5efbvbyTuk-hOmtSt-rnYSX+RDpXLUd_R-5VDqA@mail.gmail.com> <36FACA56-E32A-4C2E-9E2A-D6C3B6574206@gmail.com>

the weather is also the lack of rain - well I wish it was ;-)

Amiti?s
Ph


Le 24 mars 13 ? 23:33, Steve Barbour a ?crit :

>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> Steve Barbour
>
> On Mar 24, 2013, at 3:29 PM, Cedric Agie <cedric.agie at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
> You don't have to take notes anymore with the Leica M-9. The camera
> does it for you.
> There must be a reason.
> ***
> the same reason we have weathermen in places it never rains...
>
>
>
> Years ago Leitz made ads saying; "Leitz heist precision". Or the name
> of Leitz is precision.
>
> Regards
>
> Cedric
>
> 2013/3/24  <tedgrant at shaw.ca>:
>> Nathan Wajsman OFFERED:
>> Subject: [Leica] Technical detail--why?
>>
>>
>>
>>> Someone, I think Cedric, commented on Jean-Michel's pictures  
>>> today, asking
>>> for technical details. That got me thinking--back when I first  
>>> took up
>>> photography in 1985, I religiously noted lens, exposure etc. in a  
>>> notebook.
>>> I still have that notebook. The only thing is, the I have never  
>>> actually
>>> used the information noted therein. Nowadays, I do not care about  
>>> the
>>> technical details, indeed, when I post my weekly pictures, I don't  
>>> even
>>> mention the equipment used. What's the point? Either the photo is  
>>> good or it
>>> isn't. Whether I used my 4x5 or my iPhone should not influence the  
>>> viewer's
>>> evaluation.
>>>
>>> Technical details are useless at best, and harmful at worst.<<<<<<<
>>
>>
>> Hi Nathan,
>> Keeping details as I have heard many many photogs do over the  
>> years. I have
>> always asked.... "why do you do that?" The usual reply is great if  
>> one is a
>> techie instead of a photographer first.  "Just in case I need it to  
>> take a
>> similar picture."  Or, "so I will know what lens or film I used."  
>> As though
>> they're going to shoot the same scene same place 5 years later.
>>
>> The logical time anything technical needs to be "remembered" is  
>> there is a
>> specific action seen in the photograph." Blurred background in a  
>> foot race
>> or race cars and one wants to illustrate the high speed.... Whether  
>> you
>> write it down or not doesn't matter as all you need to know is to  
>> use a slow
>> shutter speed  and pan camera as fast as the cars or athletes are  
>> moving.
>>
>> It's called.... "Shooting swishy-pans" And I've done that since my  
>> first
>> Summer Olympics in Mexico 1968? Sure makes high school kids in a  
>> race look
>> like they're going 100 miles an hour.
>>
>> Like you, in my very early days I asked a photographer about  
>> keeping records
>> as it appeared every frame he shot he wrote it into a "little black  
>> book"
>> full of numbers, lens size, film, ASA rating etc etec. So I  
>> thought, "Gee if
>> he's doing that I better do it as it must be very important because  
>> he
>> writes it down after every picture taken."
>>
>> Bought a little black book, dated the page, location, camera (Leica  
>> of
>> course,) lens, aperture and shutter speed. ) As I closed the book  
>> after an
>> entry a super neat stock-car crash had begun to happen! In the  
>> confusion of
>> writing down the stupid information I missed a particularly amazing  
>> crash of
>> two cars rolling over and over!
>>
>> I bent down, picked up the little black book and threw it as far as  
>> I could
>> into the race track infield and never ever ever made any notes  
>> again! But
>> the techies love it!  In reality it's nothing but an incredible  
>> waste of
>> time for real photographers who take pictures to capture incredible  
>> content
>> moments!
>>
>> I DON'T CARE WHO THE HELL THE PHOTOG IS, THERE IS ONLY ONE THING  
>> YOU NEED TO
>> DO !
>>
>> and that is shoot succesful, interesting and on occaision.......   
>> mind
>> blowing photographs.
>>
>> WHAT LENS? HELL TELL ANYONE ASKING, ANY OLD NUMBER AS IT WONT MAKE  
>> ANY
>> DIFFERENCE SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WONT OWN, NOR RUSH OUT AND POP $3 or  
>> $4
>> THOUSAND FOR THE LENS IN ANY EVENT.
>>
>> And even if they did the chancs are they'd be so busy making notes  
>> they'd
>> miss the shot with their new $4k shining new lens.
>>
>> But then what doesn't turn my heart into a racing vehicle of  
>> excitment
>> having written it in the little black book. Turns the techie into a  
>> fireball
>> of wisdom because they have it written down for the next occaision  
>> 25 years
>> from now when they need the information.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Dr. ted :-)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>> Alicante, Spain
>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>>>
>>> YNWA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible  
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.

NO ARCHIVE





In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)
Message from cedric.agie at gmail.com (Cedric Agie) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)