Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/03/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Technical detail--why?
From: philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard)
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 21:52:48 +0100
References: <1FAEC7E9-142F-40DF-BB4C-AECAA40CEDF9@frozenlight.eu> <EB1CAE194A1E4FFCBB91ABB648C39D80@syneticfeba505> <CABNC8SpzNgU5efbvbyTuk-hOmtSt-rnYSX+RDpXLUd_R-5VDqA@mail.gmail.com> <CABNC8SpStuO+k+CgkgGrA0pRHcQXT+ujQv557HseZdqWckV0WA@mail.gmail.com> <163455EC-1EF2-43AB-9351-A4FA097765F2@sfr.fr> <CAFfkXxtvZb2K8AMSZfKzjVKhtAddEa4daZTwgqnzLpCvqcCJmA@mail.gmail.com>
Le 25 mars 13 ? 20:46, Sonny Carter a ?crit :
> If you find yourself fiddling around with a camera, looking at a
> notebook, then you need to be carrying a photographer's bag instead of
> pretending to be one.
Do we need to be that offensive on this list?
Ph
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exup?ry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
Replies:
Reply from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)
In reply to:
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)
Message from cedric.agie at gmail.com (Cedric Agie) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)
Message from cedric.agie at gmail.com (Cedric Agie) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Technical detail--why?)