Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Efex Pro vs PhotoMatix
From: frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:36:19 +0000 (GMT)
References: <CA+yJO1Bf0Mmj7SzbK8bMsOGq+rh_tcQn9mv9KKPS8qHqPt4Ktg@mail.gmail.com>

The Efex pro looks more natural to me but they certainly are very different 
renderings!
Frank



>________________________________
> From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net>
>To: MUGers at yahoogroups.com; Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>; 
>paw <paw at micapeak.com>; seephoto <seephoto at micapeak.com>; Olympus 
>Camera Discussion <olympus at thomasclausen.net> 
>Sent: Friday, 29 March 2013, 16:02
>Subject: [Leica] Efex Pro vs PhotoMatix
> 
>PESO:
>
>Those who are allergic to HDR, don't look!? I downloaded the free Nik
>software which includes their HDR program and compared it with the one I
>have been using - PhotoMatix.
>
>These are made in the little town of Carmona, Spain, near Seville:
>
>The Efex Pro one:
>
>http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/149421361
>
>and the PhotoMatix one:
>
>http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/149421363
>
>Of course, there are thousands of ways you can adjust each one but I prefer
>something natural looking so that ruled out quite a bit.
>
>Which do you prefer?
>
>Tina
>
>-- 
>Tina Manley, ASMP
>www.tinamanley.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>


Replies: Reply from cedric.agie at gmail.com (Cedric Agie) ([Leica] Efex Pro vs PhotoMatix)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Efex Pro vs PhotoMatix)