Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 22:51:40 -0700
References: <CAF8hL-HJuiPn_SoqUvfm=HpGStA2NiB0Ftev+HPEae7G9oLMYA@mail.gmail.com> <013D8AC8-0303-4B94-8BB2-EE3BEB9E59D5@frozenlight.eu>

The v700/750 real DPI is about 2400, so scanning at 3200 gives you a little
more. Any higher is just interpolation.
On Apr 5, 2013 10:32 PM, "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:

> Puny :-)
>
> Actually, I too scan on an Epson flatbed, the V700, at its maximum optical
> resolution of 6400 dpi. I do wish I had a dedicated MF scanner, but given
> that I only shoot 10-20 rolls a year, I cannot justify the expense.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 5, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>
> > This is really just a test to see if a commercial lab's processed 4x5
> color
> > neg has the color cast or not, and sure enough the colors are quite
> > accurate. This means that my processing can be better still. I hope I can
> > get the color cast problems resolved. I like the flexibility to shoot in
> > color without the 6 steps needed to process slides...
> >
> > In any case, just a quick and fast 3200 DPI scan with the Epson flatbed.
> > Imagine what it looks like with a proper drum scan (not that this
> > particular image is worth it).
> >
> > http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20130405-Scanned-18.jpg
> >
> > --
> > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> > // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?)
Reply from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?)
In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?)