Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/04/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?
From: richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man)
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 23:45:23 -0700
References: <CAF8hL-HJuiPn_SoqUvfm=HpGStA2NiB0Ftev+HPEae7G9oLMYA@mail.gmail.com> <013D8AC8-0303-4B94-8BB2-EE3BEB9E59D5@frozenlight.eu> <CAF8hL-GTQD9PVsDJ_8N9_k=H+fSD_KsoRGbbiFio258+Lgn6jg@mail.gmail.com> <922A3B30-420F-42FD-965B-8223849D4A9A@frozenlight.eu>

That's not what people doing empirical experiment says... Anyway, it prints
amazingly on 17x22 already. If I ever print bigger, I may send it out for
drum scan.


On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at 
frozenlight.eu>wrote:

> According to the manual, optical resolution goes to 6400 with film (4800
> reflective).
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 6, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Richard Man wrote:
>
> > The v700/750 real DPI is about 2400, so scanning at 3200 gives you a
> little
> > more. Any higher is just interpolation.
> > On Apr 5, 2013 10:32 PM, "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at frozenlight.eu> 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Puny :-)
> >>
> >> Actually, I too scan on an Epson flatbed, the V700, at its maximum
> optical
> >> resolution of 6400 dpi. I do wish I had a dedicated MF scanner, but
> given
> >> that I only shoot 10-20 rolls a year, I cannot justify the expense.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Nathan
> >>
> >> Nathan Wajsman
> >> Alicante, Spain
> >> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> >> http://www.greatpix.eu
> >> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> >> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
> >>
> >> YNWA
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 5, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Richard Man wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is really just a test to see if a commercial lab's processed 4x5
> >> color
> >>> neg has the color cast or not, and sure enough the colors are quite
> >>> accurate. This means that my processing can be better still. I hope I
> can
> >>> get the color cast problems resolved. I like the flexibility to shoot
> in
> >>> color without the 6 steps needed to process slides...
> >>>
> >>> In any case, just a quick and fast 3200 DPI scan with the Epson
> flatbed.
> >>> Imagine what it looks like with a proper drum scan (not that this
> >>> particular image is worth it).
> >>>
> >>> http://richardmanphoto.com/PICS/20130405-Scanned-18.jpg
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
> >>> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
// richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
// http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto


In reply to: Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan, how about a 168 Megapixel image :-)?)