Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2013/05/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] DNG was Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model
From: abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 14:32:46 -0700
References: <CAH1UNJ2T02hD9coBZ_TyNsX3d9Cfu75P0c3d6ytkEh1UR95sMA@mail.gmail.com> <00FAFAC6-1C08-49A2-87F9-E9E95D4E9D29@frozenlight.eu> <CAE3QcF6y4-YaF_2sxQPayft5x5NWwpXmf3VSxd6b3waq993Q4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAF8hL-FYKtxptAts0HQVQ61BwJrh3qjtha=xRNnjs-Vkq70LUg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFuU78d-sH1FMG9mkd+Bb6H_OJurxWKs3OrmOocqRudtN0Gfqw@mail.gmail.com> <1368124703.42954.YahooMailNeo@web125003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <38F36DFB-9A93-42EB-900C-7D5830249F51@mac.com> <1368205505.68627.YahooMailNeo@web125004.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Why this concern about DNG? It's an open specification. How would Adobe make
it go away? Suddenly every specification for the DNG format will vanish?
I don't think so.
Now the software that makes the conversion between Camera X's proprietary
RAW format might vanish but not the format itself.
I image Leica, whose cameras make DNG format, would have some thoughts on
that.
In reply to:
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from rcmphoto at yahoo.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)
Message from rcmphoto at yahoo.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] Petition Against Adobe Subscription Model)