Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] a photographer sued
From: ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter)
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 13:25:03 -0400
References: <17179467.1369583424656.JavaMail.root@mswamui-swiss.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <51A238A4.4080900@gmail.com> <D57DCE7E12AD4B86ABF8A2B92A435AE8@billHP>
 
so, am i conflicted

seeing the pictures is very important here

many were online

they're not the voyeuristic snaps i expected from reading about them

most are not of identifiable

still, i don't care for anyone shooting pics through my window

wasn't there some woman who did this in a very invasive fashion a couple of 
years ago?

ric




On May 26, 2013, at 1:08 PM, "Bill Pearce" <billcpearce at cox.net> wrote:

> I am conflicted by this project. Some of the samples I have seen on the 
> net interest me, and I would certainly hang them in my home. It seems to 
> be the logical extension of the seventies photographers that shot 
> "landscapes" that attempted to show the banality of American life, a thing 
> that I recognised but didn't want to see reinforced. So I like some of the 
> results but don't like the concept. Ugh!
> 
> --
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Reply from jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
 In reply to: Message from montoid at earthlink.net (Montie) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from michael.t.russ at gmail.com (Michael Russ) ([Leica] a photographer sued)
Message from billcpearce at cox.net (Bill Pearce) ([Leica] a photographer sued)