Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Mini-M [was Re: REASONS why Leica is so slow with M]
From: dennis.leicam6 at gmail.com (Dennis Kushner)
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 01:59:06 -0400
References: <CAE3QcF4WyzKD3LCOspJ8XrrsYjZ4qtiu2gpiWUnNqiVymCR60w@mail.gmail.com> <CDC86852.A2C3%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Leica releasing something new & not making us wait years for the next
Photokina?



On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:33 AM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:

> I agree Geoff Leica announces a milestone camera with a ton of innovations
> and it comes out perfectly as advertized the day they say its going to with
> no problems. That's news. That's man bites dog.
> A delay? That's not even news. That's dog bites man.
>
> As anyone whose followed Leica for more than a few years knows that even in
> the old days when a huge shift of technology was not going on it it was
> quite common for there to be some gremlins in the planning.
> Loose Lugs is one of the more common reasons. Its the first one I think of.
> That has happened at least twice before with two other cameras in my
> memory.
> Not that its not ironic that with the much higher level of complexity the
> cameras have now in the digital age with all the higher level quality
> controll needed it a LUG again which stalls the boat. But it can happen and
> it did. Reality is so much more fun than fiction.
>
> But to someone who really has no intention of spending seven grand on a
> camera in a million years a stall in a camera release  means the entire
> camera company is not valid. It's making jewelry for billionaires.
> Wow you're vindicated now! Keep shooting with your cropped Pentax!
>
> As if if there was a camera in that box and it was offered to you at half
> price you'd buy it.
> As you're not going to spend 3.5 grand on a camera body either.
> There's no auto focus is there? No ground glass...
>
>
> On 5/25/13 12:56 AM, "Geoff Hopkinson" <hopsternew at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Richard the interest in the M Typ 240 here was not much different, I
> guess.
> > I think we only have a couple of people who have received them thus far
> to
> > share photos too. Heaven knows how long until the Mini M is in someone's
> > hands.
> >
> > Different cultures between LUG and L Camera Forum too.
> > On May 25, 2013 12:17 PM, "Richard Taylor" <r.s.taylor at comcast.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> What amazes me most about the Leica announcement of the Mini M is the
> yawn
> >> it seems to have received from the LUG.  I wouldn't say the LUF was
> exactly
> >> ablaze with excitement ...
> >>
> >>
> http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/leica-m9-forum/285598-mini-m.html
> >>
> >> ... but we're absolutely moribund about it.
> >>
> >> That is astonishing, if you think about it.
> >>
> >> Dick
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On May 24, 2013, at 9:35 PM, Geoff Hopkinson wrote:
> >>
> >>> It's not a rumour, George. It is up on the official site and their blog
> >> as
> >>> a teaser to increase interest I guess.
> >>> I don't know that they are concerned with competing with FujiFilm
> though.
> >>> Different market segments. I don't think that it will compete with the
> M
> >>> Typ 240 either and for the same reason. Still I'm not a business
> manager.
> >>> The new Leica has been in development for at least 3 years I believe.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Breathe in, breathe out, move on* -- Jimmy Buffett
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Geoff
> >>> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 25 May 2013 11:03, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On May 23, 2013, at 9:36 AM, mehrdad wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://photorumors.com/2013/05/23/leica-coming-out-with-a-mini-m-camera-on-ju
> >>
> ne-11/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PhotoRu
> >> mors+%28PhotoRumors.com%29
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> they are working on another camera!!
> >>>>
> >>>> they trying to put their finger in the hole that Fuji drilled in the
> >> dike?
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> George Lottermoser
> >>>> george at imagist.com
> >>>> http://www.imagist.com
> >>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Leica Mini-M [was Re: REASONS why leica is so slow with M])
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Leica Mini-M [was Re: REASONS why Leica is so slow with M])