Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/06/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Jun 11, 2013, at 1:20 PM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: > Yes, but let me give you some additional perspective: > > - the Fuji provides excellent image quality all the way to ISO 6400. This > may or may not be an issue for you--it is for me. > - I fully buy into your statements over the years that cameras work best > with their own lenses. The Fuji, however, is the first non-Leica camera on > which I have ENJOYED using my Leica M lenses right on Nathan, fun, sensible, with great results, Steve > - and for travelling super-light, the Fuji with the 18-55mm zoom is just > the ticket. This is what I will be taking to Brussels next week. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ > > YNWA > > > > > > > > > > On Jun 11, 2013, at 10:12 PM, George Lottermoser wrote: > >> >> On Jun 11, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote: >> >>> I know what you mean. I am enjoying my newly acquired Fuji X-Pro 1--by >>> any measure it is a superior picture-taking machine compared to the M8 >>> and M9. But nothing fits in my hand like the M8 (and the various film Ms >>> before that). >> >> That's a very useful comment Nathan. >> As I read the Fuji-praise - I begin to wonder, "?do I need one of these?" >> you just toned that back considerably. >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george at imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com >> http://www.imagist.com/blog >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information