Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/07/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] An Observation
From: montoid at earthlink.net (Montie)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:00:55 -0400 (GMT-04:00)

OK, got it, no clue, maybe more oly users than leica?

Montie


>Yes, both sites use the same basic software, with a few different choices.
>
>My point is that more people look at my images on the OM gallery than do on 
>the LUG gallery.  About twice as many.
>
>Jim Nichols
>Tullahoma, TN USA
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Montie" <montoid at earthlink.net>
>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:09 PM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] An Observation
>
>
>> Not real sure what you are asking here, but your images usually look fine 
>> on both sites (on my screen, anyway).
>>
>> Montie
>>
>>
>>>When I post images made with Zuiko lenses, I post to the OM Gallery.  
>>>When 
>>>I have images made with Leica lenses, I post to the LUG Gallery.  My 
>>>email 
>>>messages announcing these images go to both lists.
>>>
>>>I normally find that images posted to the OM Gallery get twice as many 
>>>viewings as those posted to the LUG Gallery.  This is puzzling to me.
>>>
>>>Do OM listers browse the galleries, independent of recent posting 
>>>messages?
>>>
>>>Or, AG, could there be a different tracking algorithm in play here?
>>>
>>>Jim Nichols
>>>Tullahoma, TN USA
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Leica Users Group.
>>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>> 
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information