Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/09/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Image difference between M and "new" M9
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:39:55 -0700
References: <10020877.1379125878414.JavaMail.root@mswamui-valley.atl.sa.earthlink.net>

Yes. Just don't change lenses in a dusty area! Buy one M for each lens...

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 13, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> 
wrote:

> Mehrdad wrote:
> 
>> 
>> but none of the lenses are weatherproof
> 
> Leica has said that for all practical purposes they're as weatherproof as 
> the M body.
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Image difference between M and "new" M9)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca) ([Leica] Image difference between M and "new" M9)
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Image difference between M and "new" M9)