Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/09/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Image difference between M and "new" M9
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (tedgrant at shaw.ca)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 23:13:01 -0700
References: <10020877.1379125878414.JavaMail.root@mswamui-valley.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <FC76923A-38C9-4862-A216-79405B1AC185@gmail.com>
 
Bob Adler OFFERED:
Subject: Re: [Leica] Image difference between M and "new" M9


> Yes. Just don't change lenses in a dusty area! Buy one M for each 
> lens...<<

Hi Bob,
One of the reasons I had three M bodies and different lens on my neck or 
shoulders was never about dust etc. Although I was always very careful in 
that kind of environment while shooting.

But I had the three bodies simply because I absolutely hated having to 
change film and certainly a lens in the middle of a shoot! These things 
inevitably were always necessary right at the main moments of action 
regardless of subject! :-(

cheers,
ted
In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Image difference between M and "new" M9)
Message from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Image difference between M and "new" M9)