Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Leica using photographer
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:16:37 -0700
References: <8D09C869AB4981E-10C4-2BF78@webmail-va009.sysops.aol.com> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9D0D3E477@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>
 
you guys need to talk with Jeffery Smith



s




On Oct 21, 2013, at 12:09 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:

> I have a quantity of 50mm lenses (my most used focal length) from 1950s DR 
> to current FLE, they all have a different look with good and bad points 
> for each ;-)
> 
> john
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> Overgaard ranks the various 50 mm lenses with the best being the latest 
>> with
>> a floating element. Bear in mind that the differences are subtile and 
>> certainly
>> not apparent on a computer screen. In fact I doubt that you could see any
>> difference in lens quality short of examining a really large sized paper 
>> print. A
>> good read, though. Thanks, Steve.
>> Larry Z
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Leica using photographer)
 In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at aol.com (lrzeitlin at aol.com) ([Leica] Leica using photographer)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Leica using photographer)