Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry but have not been following this thread, so cannot chime in... Sent from my iPad > On Oct 22, 2013, at 10:30 PM, "Frank Filippone" <red735i at verizon.net> > wrote: > > I think a response from Bob Adler and his experience with Digital-MF would > be a good place for further understanding..... > > It is not so much about the number of pixels, but rather the inter-spacing > distance of those pixels that counts..... > > Noise being the number 1 problem..... > > BTW, I hope everyone understands that most existent lenses are going to be > limited... the Sensor being better than the lens....and don't even try to > think through the issues with the mechanical RF.... > > You need to be able to look through the lens for focusing, and have micro > adjustability of your lenses' focus, and best of all, have a EVF to make > things go right.....to even approach the limits of these 24-36MP > cameras..... or lenses designed for them..... > > I won't mention the tripod, delayed shutter release, no wind, no land > movement from passing trucks, nor object movement.....otherwise you just do > not get the improved quality that these sensors are capable of..... > > The best rationale for a 24-36MP camera is for the ability to crop with > higher pixel count as your daily 7-18MP user of today...... > > Frank Filippone > Red735i at verizon.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information