Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/10/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Some Nikon vs Leica lens results......
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 16:59:38 -0700
References: <0b7101ced36a$804458c0$80cd0a40$@verizon.net>

frank why do want to switch to nikon? also have u looked the fuji x cameras
and lenses, small, af and very goood

  -------------------------------------
  regards, mehrdad


On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Frank Filippone <red735i at 
verizon.net>wrote:

> My buddy came over and he shot his D4 against my M9... so the test images
> made, were native ..  no adapters used... Cloudy bright day, 20 foot
> distance to focusing target ( a grape stick fence in my front yard).  Area
> focused upon included the fence and grass both in front and behind and at a
> distance of maybe 200 yards, some cars.
>
>
>
> First of all my buddy screwed up the focusing on some of the MF lenses...
> he
> is too used to AF, obviously..  And maybe does not see/know about the
> little
> lights...
>
>
>
> Enuf complaints..
>
>
>
> Lenses:
>
> Leica : WATE, 3E,50 ASPH Lux, 90 Elmarit M
>
> Nikon: 18AIS, 18-35 AFS, 24-85 G, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.4 G
>
>
>
> Apertures..  F1.4, F4, F8.. basically wide open, and again at F8.  ( a
> waste
> of time.. If a lens was best wide open, it was still best stopped down,
> etc.)
>
>
>
> I compared image area that was in focus.  ( See note above)
>
>
>
> The results were mixed...
>
> The 50 Summilux absolutely outperformed anything at any F-stop.. THE best.
>
> Ditto this particular 90 Elmarit-M..which is a great performer..
>
> The 3E at 50 mm was very weak.  But best at 28 and 35 for this grouping.
>
> The WATE kicked all the lenses at 18mm..
>
> Surprise.. the 18/3.5 Nikkor did pretty well for a 30+ year old design.  At
> least as well as the 28-35.. but a bit more flare..no hood..
>
>
>
> Both the 18-35 and 24-85 are good performers.. In general.. But not up to
> Leica standard.  ( maybe not a surprise for the rest of you)
>
>
>
> Leica was overall the best. optically.
>
> Nikon did very well, and at times, it was hard to tell the differences..
>
>
>
> But the question remains, are the Nikon offerings good enuf for my
> purposes?
>
>
>
>
>
> Frank Filippone
>
> Red735i at verizon.net
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Some Nikon vs Leica lens results......)
In reply to: Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Some Nikon vs Leica lens results......)