Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2013/12/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Used 1.2 Nocti
From: mak at teleport.com (Mark Kronquist)
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:24:20 -0800
References: <53ACF0A9-FA64-4425-AAED-A9B9D05DED83@bex.net> <D48B94E8-1FA5-463A-9466-1A605C105FE3@frozenlight.eu> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9D0F26129@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org> <382312006.392198.1388260728993.JavaMail.www@wsfrf1310> <80F9701439F20347874CE5E4E03C22E9D0F2614B@WhizzMAIL01.whizz.org>

Beware if photon errosion.  A serious issue.  I will happily accept  
used nocti where photons have gone thru glass

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 28, 2013, at 12:04 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.co.nz> wrote:

> I have bought that, but not as a direct import ;-) I bought a 100mm  
> APO macro off the trade site for a good price at the time, less than  
> they go for now...
>
> john
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> .. I have bought from the Czech Republic with no issue....
>>
>> john
>>
>> Does this include the REAL Budweiser?
>>
>> Amities
>> Philippe
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>
>>> There is nothing wrong with the Czech Republic, but why pay a  
>>> premium
>>> for an inferior 1.2 lens? You might just as well buy a new 1.4
>>> Summilux--yes, 1/2 stop slower but much better quality and less
>>> weight. I can understand the attraction of the 1.0 Nocti (I used to
>>> have one in the mists of time) but the 1.2 should be of interest  
>>> to collectors
>> only.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Nathan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 28, 2013, at 8:04 PM, Howard Ritter wrote:
>>>
>>>> There's a gloriously well used 1.2 Nocti up for bids at the usual
>>>> place, item #
>>> 2254682. I am actually for one in the rough condition that it's in,
>>> provided that it's optically and mechanically functional. It would
>>> make a good match for my equally brassed and bonked M5, and
>> presumably useful on my M9 as well.
>>>>
>>>> Trouble is, I wanted a user f/1 rather than 1.2 both because of the
>>>> faster f/
>>> ratio and because I don't want to pay a premium for a rare lens. I  
>>> am
>>> not in the market for anything near what the seller is asking in  
>>> this
>>> case, but I'd like to solicit opinions on a reasonable figure to  
>>> offer
>>> and on the wisdom of buying from a seller (albeit putatively with  
>>> lots
>>> of good feedback, whatever that's worth) in the Czech Republic.
>>>>
>>>> If this request is out of bounds after Friday, I apologize, but I
>>>> figured it's OK
>>> because I'm not trying to sell something. Feel free to answer off- 
>>> list.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to all.
>>>>
>>>> -howard
>>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from hlritter at bex.net (Howard Ritter) ([Leica] Used 1.2 Nocti)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Used 1.2 Nocti)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Used 1.2 Nocti)
Message from philippe.amard at sfr.fr (philippe.amard at sfr.fr) ([Leica] Used 1.2 Nocti)
Message from john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] Used 1.2 Nocti)