Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The Real Cost of Leicas
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 10:02:47 +0000
References: <27740840.1389425472121.JavaMail.root@mswamui-valley.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <012AD21E-8738-4C0A-9BDB-6E7D4DD2D557@frozenlight.eu>

It is all but impossible to compare. A Leica M6 was certainly more expensive 
new than a Canon EOS 1n when they were new. Leica lenses have always been 
more expensive than all but a tiny few from other makes.

Comparing with today's prices here in the UK at the dealer I bought my Leica 
M9 and M from I find:
Canon top body ?4899
Nikon top body ?4949
Leica top body ?5099 (colour) ?6200 B&W

Yes the Nikon and Canon have more versatility, as they did in film days, but 
the difference in price is certainly less than in film days.

Premium lenses are more difficult to compare since their are almost no 
equivalents in both FL aperture and build quality.
Some samples though:
Nikon 58mm f1.4 ?1599
Leica 50mm f1.4 asph ?2520
Canon 50mm f1.2 ?1259

I haven't used the Nikon but the Canon isn't a patch on the Leica 50 IME.

FWIW,

Frank D


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] The Real Cost of Leicas)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] The Real Cost of Leicas)