Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] More A7r Test... this time with 50mm non-native lenses.....
From: kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:13:47 -0600
References: <033a01cf1280$b3bdd4b0$1b397e10$@verizon.net> <000701cf12c8$58a1c670$09e55350$@verizon.net> <Egjb1n01r0AFV7C01gjdHL>
 
I was looking through my stuff and saw some Zeiss T* lenses from the 
film era, c. 1970: 25mm Distagon 2.8, 50mm Planar 1.4 and 135mm 2.8.  
Just curious as to how they would do a digital such as the Sony - I'm 
thinking they are probably behind the curve but thought I would see if 
anyone had any input.  I had good results with them in the olden days.

Ken

On 1/16/2014 10:43 AM, Adam Bridge wrote:
> I read this last night. The little (much less expensive) Zeiss Sonnar did 
> pretty well itself.
>
> Adam
>
> On Jan 16, 2014, at 6:36 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> 
> wrote:
>
>> Noctilux, Summilux ASPH, Otus, Zeiss Sonnar
>>
>>
>>
>> The Otus just outclasses them all..
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] More A7r Test... this time with 50mm non-native lenses.....)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] More A7r Test... this time with 50mm non-native lenses.....)