Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Autofocus & battery life question
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:36:29 -0600
References: <CAFuU78eDQyYEdPWnr4uwKB0EUu-_DBVZiUFRq338tb3+5rvafw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1UNJ3r_O5iQAwmYLRAYDbnabqmnVh_SbSiaq7d3ckTW2FQCg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFfkXxuFzedXRO4uJi9BCSkGH1QFZNvdVt0-+wQJ6DGT9TsPbw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFuU78ckV6mztQJ9WnzCwvKbJkv5eWWUD0C=xoKpscNzH4=_wA@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry if I sounded like I was trying to NOT answer your question, but to me
there are always so many variables, I don't even try to guess how long they
are going to last; leastways with a lens they have not released yet.

I guess we'll see when we'll see, huh?


On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have spares, too. My question is, since the 70-200 has 2 motors in
> the lens, wouldn't it also have twice the battery drain?
> -Lew Schwartz
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> > I'm getting about the same or a little better battery life from the Sony
> > A7r as I get from my M9, when I use the Zeiss AF 35mm lens.  I don't
> notice
> > a big difference from using it with Leica lenses with no AF.  The small
> > batteries (not aftermarket) are $40 from Amazon, so there's no reason no
> to
> > have spares.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Jayanand Govindaraj <
> jayanand at gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> I dont know about Sony, but Nikon cameras (D800E, D4) with the 70-200
> >> and 200-400 which I have used tend to go on forever. On the D800, with
> >> normal usage (no live view) I get around 1000 shots, and if I turn off
> >> the LCD, I get over 1600 shots per charge. I have never managed to
> >> deplete the D4 battery yet, even after shooting over 2200 shots once.
> >> Cheers
> >> Jayanand
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Lew Schwartz <lew1716 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > I just noticed that SONY will be releasing a hefty tele-zoom for its
> >> > AR series. (70-200mm I think). It boasts 2 motors; I guess this is
> >> > necessary to speed up autofocus because of the increased mass of its
> >> > glass. Do other mfgrs do this? It seems to me that this would cut
> >> > battery life, no?
> >> >
> >> > Comments?
> >> >
> >> > -Lew Schwartz
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Leica Users Group.
> >> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Sonny
> > http://sonc.com/look/
> > Natchitoches, Louisiana
> > 1714
> > Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase
> >
> > USA
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://sonc.com/look/
Natchitoches, Louisiana
1714
Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase

USA


In reply to: Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Autofocus & battery life question)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Autofocus & battery life question)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Autofocus & battery life question)
Message from lew1716 at gmail.com (Lew Schwartz) ([Leica] Autofocus & battery life question)