Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/08/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Less is More
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:44:32 +0530
References: <04d401cfbd48$992816b0$cb784410$@verizon.net> <E6020568-659B-46F5-8960-A91721215E55@cartersxrd.net>
 
And still have a queue of diehards lining up to buy it? :-) Note that the
poll, as it is now, reflects that 37% of the respondents would buy it -
which must surely make Kaufman and Blackstone pretty happy!

I think Kaufman understands the Leica customer psyche better than most. :-)

Cheers
Jayanand


On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 7:44 PM, RicCarter <ric at cartersxrd.net> wrote:

> only leica would or could make a LESS functional camera and charge MORE
> for it;^)
>
> ric
>
>
>
> On Aug 21, 2014, at 10:02 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> 
> wrote:
>
> > http://leicarumors.com/
> >
>
> > Frank Filippone
> >
> > Red735i at verizon.net
>
>
Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] Less is More)
 In reply to: Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Less is More)
Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] Less is More)