Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sort of like 2 + 2 = 5. For sufficiently large values of 2. It does sound like a good lens. Though I can only read Lloyd's blog remarks, the actual tests are behind a pay wall. Seriously, does anyone here actually subscribe to DigiLloyd? His prices are rather steep, and his content is divided into several categories, a la carte. "Everything" is $360 per year. And of course, his Leica reviews are the most expensive category. But you can "save $95 per year" by subscribing to everything. Geez, Louise, he must be valuable. :-) --Peter > best M lens available today, when it ships in December? > > Did I read one of those phrases wrong? > > > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Richard Man <richard at richardmanphoto.com> > wrote: > > > Doesn't matter to me. I can't afford new Leica lens, even if it says Zeiss > > :-) > > > > > > http://diglloyd.com/blog/2014/20141011_1814-ZeissZM-35f1_4-Distagon-best-M-lens.html > > > > -- > > // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> > > // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto > > // https://www.facebook.com/Transformations.CosplayPortraits > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >