Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 06:03:26 -0500
References: <32402C5B-142A-4463-A735-253A4CBFC4A4@gmail.com> <BC2300AA-DCC2-48CC-9B6C-5D0633C0E9E5@frozenlight.eu> <CAE3QcF7XXiKzXBU1wjZmtmNV2s0CHK4c5OSNaxh=CdCaL8bGyQ@mail.gmail.com>

Of course, scanning takes you a generation away from the original. The MM 
file is an original.

Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 7, 2014, at 12:48 AM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Yes all great shots. It is the content that is important of course. For web
> size images the differences are more subtle.
> When you talk about comparing you have to decide which things are 
> important.
> When you scan anything you are also limited by what the scanner can do as
> well. The lens of the scanner and how accutarte it tracks and the contrast
> and dynamic range it can record.
> With the same camera lens and correct exposure and same subject the
> Monochrom files are a LOT better than anything you can get with scanned
> 35mm film as far as smoothness and tonal range and resolution.
> Side by side you can see the difference. When you look at the files zoomed
> in on a computer the differences are very obvious.
> None of that may matter for web images.
> 
> 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman
> 
>> On 7 October 2014 15:02, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:
>> 
>> I don't see much difference, all are excellent.
>> 
>> Un abrazo,
>> Nathan
>> 
>> Nathan Wajsman
>> 
>> Alicante, Spain
>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
>> 
>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
>> 
>> YNWA
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 06 Oct 2014, at 03:25, Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollphotography at 
>> gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I have scanned two film backlights from the year 2007 with Kodak Plus X,
>> Leica MP, lens ignored. Plustek scanner and Vuescan :
>>> 
>>> Carrer del Correu Vell
>>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031228LR5BN.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The Light Way
>>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031216LR5BN.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Please compare to the Leica Monochrom with Tri Elmar recently posted:
>>> 
>>> <
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141003_L1001068__MMLR5BN.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>> All these pictures have a slightly touch of Silver Efex Pro, same toning
>> applied to all.
>>> 
>>> In my opinion I can't say any better quality on film vs MM, except the
>> grain of course, I've don't put it on the MM version, I consider it is
>> artificial. What do you think?
>>> 
>>> Thanks for looking, your c&c are greatly appreciated
>>> 
>>> Saludos cordiales
>>> Lluis
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film)
In reply to: Message from lluisripollphotography at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] Comparing Backlight B&W MM and Film)