Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you Sonny, Geoff, Nathan I agree that the direct image on the sensor is better, the important point for me is the quality of the B&W and IMHO it demonstrates that B&W is exquisite. Cheers Lluis El 07/10/2014, a las 13:03, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> escribi?: > Of course, scanning takes you a generation away from the original. The MM > file is an original. > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Oct 7, 2014, at 12:48 AM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Yes all great shots. It is the content that is important of course. For >> web >> size images the differences are more subtle. >> When you talk about comparing you have to decide which things are >> important. >> When you scan anything you are also limited by what the scanner can do as >> well. The lens of the scanner and how accutarte it tracks and the contrast >> and dynamic range it can record. >> With the same camera lens and correct exposure and same subject the >> Monochrom files are a LOT better than anything you can get with scanned >> 35mm film as far as smoothness and tonal range and resolution. >> Side by side you can see the difference. When you look at the files zoomed >> in on a computer the differences are very obvious. >> None of that may matter for web images. >> >> >> Cheers >> Geoff >> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman >> >>> On 7 October 2014 15:02, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote: >>> >>> I don't see much difference, all are excellent. >>> >>> Un abrazo, >>> Nathan >>> >>> Nathan Wajsman >>> >>> Alicante, Spain >>> http://www.frozenlight.eu >>> http://www.greatpix.eu >>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws >>> Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator >>> >>> YNWA >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 06 Oct 2014, at 03:25, Lluis Ripoll <lluisripollphotography at >>> gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I have scanned two film backlights from the year 2007 with Kodak Plus X, >>> Leica MP, lens ignored. Plustek scanner and Vuescan : >>>> >>>> Carrer del Correu Vell >>>> < >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031228LR5BN.jpg.html >>>> >>>> >>>> The Light Way >>>> < >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/2007031216LR5BN.jpg.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Please compare to the Leica Monochrom with Tri Elmar recently posted: >>>> >>>> < >>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Miscellaneous/20141003_L1001068__MMLR5BN.jpg.html >>>> >>>> >>>> All these pictures have a slightly touch of Silver Efex Pro, same toning >>> applied to all. >>>> >>>> In my opinion I can't say any better quality on film vs MM, except the >>> grain of course, I've don't put it on the MM version, I consider it is >>> artificial. What do you think? >>>> >>>> Thanks for looking, your c&c are greatly appreciated >>>> >>>> Saludos cordiales >>>> Lluis >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information