Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/10/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital M product no breakdown
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 08:41:42 -0400

If I swung the money I'd have a hard time deciding between the current M and
the Monochrom down to the last minute.. Its certainly foolish to not have
both? I mean what would be the point?!?  I certainly hope they keep
developing the Monochrom and don't let it just sit there.  The next version
should have selenium toning built in.. With a button you press on the left.

On 10/12/14 4:00 AM, "Peter A. Klein" <pklein at threshinc.com> wrote:

> I'm already esoteric. I try not to be an idiot.  I'm not rich, and if I
> buy an M 240, I would be even less so. For some reason, I'm more drawn
> to the Monchorom than the M 240. If I bought a Monochrom, I would be
> equally not rich and even more esoteric. And a lot of people would think
> I was an idiot.
> 
> I feel like Rodney Dangerfield.  :-)
> 
> --Peter
> 
> Mark Rabiner wrote:
>> So when we spend seven grand on an M instead of a Canon or Nikon body
> we are
>> in good company and not feeling like some kinds of rich esoteric idiot.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




-- 
Mark William Rabiner
Photographer
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/




Replies: Reply from csaganich at gmail.com (CJ andS) ([Leica] Digital M product no breakdown)
In reply to: Message from pklein at threshinc.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] Digital M product no breakdown)