Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2014/12/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]+1 Sue > On Dec 30, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Ted Grant <tedgrant at shaw.ca> wrote: > > Hi Geoff, > Thanks for the overall heads-up regarding the book! > > However I wouldn't even mention the line below at all! > >>> The list may like to discuss that for a future edition or any other > changes. That is up to everyone.<<< > > "HOLY COW!" To discuss anything pertaining to the book on this list and > you'd have 800,000 opinions and not one thing would ever be resolved! :-( > Pity! Two people would agree and 700,998 would all have different opinions! > > The LUG YEAR BOOK has more or less been the same great success for now, our > 9th year. It should without question be considered a "KISS PROJECT!" Use > the > same layout, paper, donation and size every year without question! WHY? > That eliminates a pile of crap discussions and great waste of time in > future > years. > "AND WITHOUT QUESTION? MAJOR HEADACHES FOR THE EDITOR!" > > And given if there's a 2015 book? Everything is in place for what I > understand a new editor! Makes life KISS simple without "starting a new > pile > of unnecessary changes!" > > Like I said, "KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID! Or SWEETHEART!" in the case of the > ladies!" The book doesn't require any two bit changes! Why change the > recipe > and screw-up something that has worked very well for 9 years? > > Despite my yelling, near cursing to have photo submissions in on time! :-) > :-) > > That's it! Everybody leave it alone!!!!!!!!! > cheers, > Dr. ted :-) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information