Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/02/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] more info on the M9 3rd party battery mystery
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard Taylor)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:39:27 -0500
References: <9E153BDB-5BD3-495E-B1AF-89417432CA0A@gmail.com>

Kyle - Since they behaved this way that are probably NiCd batteries though 
some other varieties behave this way, too, I believe.  This is normal 
behavior for batteries of this type when left on charge for a long time and 
only lightly discharged.  NiCd batteries are at their best when they are 
deep discharged regularly.  I?m not strong on the chemistry involved but you 
can find a more detailed explanation here: 

http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_to_restore_nickel_based_batteries
 

One space mission I worked on deep discharged the spacecraft batteries 
routinely as part of a battery conditioning program to keep them fully 
functional over the lifetime of the mission.  I have a GPS that requires I 
periodically fully discharge the battery (sometimes twice) before it will 
hold a charge again.  (It is almost alway run plugged into the cigarette 
lighter of my car when in use.)  

My memory is more vague on this, but i believe some NiMH batteries behave 
this way, too. 

Sounds like entirely normal behavior to me.  

Best, 

Dick
BSEE
City College of NY 1962

On Feb 27, 2015, at 11:58 AM, kyle cassidy on the LUG <leicaslacker at 
gmail.com> wrote:

> Based on input from a lugger, I tried draining the batteries completely, 
> then recharging them to 100% and putting them in the the camera ? where 
> they worked perfectly and lasted longer than the OEM battery. 
> 
> No idea why this happens, well, I have some idea, but it?s all vague. 
> Thoughts from electrical engineers?



In reply to: Message from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy on the LUG) ([Leica] more info on the M9 3rd party battery mystery)