Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/03/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part
From: john at mcmaster.co.nz (John McMaster)
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:37:40 +0000
References: <CA+yJO1B1q37ZLLJ-eZ4QGJabfsq_M0jCJ1=_QpQ7hs+0Lts-zQ@mail.gmail.com> <D1324965.35837%mark@rabinergroup.com> <CA+yJO1BFQLu-HgaeixV2nDURUXnmcAfhWkG3R9bcB5ivCRdcKg@mail.gmail.com> <52000DE2-7C00-4045-BEE6-F7F1B39D34CB@frozenlight.eu> <CA+yJO1ByThERXVLJKK4zbH3icYt7kSFK5_cOgFGV_nNQ6bt2vw@mail.gmail.com> <062C40E2-7B7E-4403-B7EA-AECA4B566E82@gmail.com> <CA+yJO1C2dO04BChcoFOVX6i-d4Z8WtLV2r-cYnoa3N+UkhSU8A@mail.gmail.com>

You are going by total emails rather than original emails with link(s) to an 
image?

john

-----Original Message-----

For March LUG, so far:

Nathan - 106 e-mails
Tina - 155 e-mails

Not quite 20 to 1.

Tina

On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> Steve Barbour
>
> On Mar 21, 2015, at 7:02 AM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Also, in the last week - since last Sunday, I have posted 13 photos on 
> the LUG.  You have posted 70.  Is the difference that you are sharing 
> and I am asking for help?
>
> The difference perhaps (since we are counting) Nathan 20 pics per 
> email, Tina
> 20 emails per pic.
>
> steve
>
> I asked before about posting them one at a time or saving them up and 
> posting a group.  The opinions seemed to be divided equally - some 
> wanted one at at time, others preferred a group so I didn't change 
> anything.
> Maybe I should.
>
> Tina
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Nathan Wajsman <photo at frozenlight.eu>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tina,
> >
> > May I ask a heretical question: are you perhaps taking too many 
> > photos, just because it is so easy with digital? You mention a 
> > figure of 16000
> from
> > your Cuba trip, That is more than I take in a year. Now, I realize 
> > that I am just an amateur while you are a pro, and I also understand 
> > that for
> your
> > stock business you need some slight variations of each image, but 
> > still
> the
> > number seems excessive. From the way you talk about the editing 
> > process,
> it
> > seems to lead to an intolerable burden afterwards, when editing them.
> > Perhaps a change from this machine-gun approach would be good for 
> > your health?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Nathan
> >
> > Nathan Wajsman
> >
> > Alicante, Spain
> > http://www.frozenlight.eu
> > http://www.greatpix.eu
> > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> > Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
> >
> > Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
> >
> > YNWA
> >


Replies: Reply from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
In reply to: Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] ***SPAM*** Re: Tina's softness/sharpness/focus issue - might be solved, in part)