Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/05/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]For me, the second one works much better at conveying the physicality you
mention than the first. The first just looks unsharp to me. In the second, I
really see the movement.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator
YNWA
> On 13 May 2015, at 06:22, Peter Klein <boulanger.croissant at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I'm always trying to convey the physicality of music-making in my still
> photographs of musicians. With string players, one obvious method is to
> slow the shutter so as to catch some blur in the bowing or the fingers.
> But how much? Too little, and it looks like a mistake. Too much, and it's
> mush. I felt like maybe I'd hit the "Goldilocks" ("just right") spot with
> this one, and I like how the two bows form a "V." What do you think?
> <https://www.flickr.com/photos/24844563 at N04/17584386211/>
>
> Then there's this one. I like the bow blur of this one most of all the
> shots I took. But I maybe messed up the framing. Does it still work, or
> is it an "almost?"
> <
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/pklein/music/peledmasterclass/P5100318.jpg.html
>>
>
> Thanks for looking. Enjoy!
> --Peter
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>