Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/07/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Fwd: The RPS and Freedom of Panorama
From: gerry.walden at icloud.com (Gerry Walden)
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2015 11:51:43 +0100
References: <1435913888641281ccbebeb6a5a28b734daf035aba_@rps.org>

Of interest in the European members of the LUG only. This could affect your 
rights to photograph in your country and others throughout the EU.

Gerry
 
Gerry Walden
023 8046 3076

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: rps hq <rpshq at rps.org>
> Subject: The RPS and Freedom of Panorama
> Date: 3 July 2015 10:06:29 BST
> To: gwpics at me.com
> Reply-To: rpshq at rps.org
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Dear UK and European Member: 
>  
> Over the past few days you may have read or been emailed about the threat 
> to ?freedom or panorama? which is included in a draft report being 
> promoted by a Member of the European Parliament (MEP). 
>  
> In the UK (and in some other countries) we enjoy the right to photograph 
> buildings and sculptures ?if permanently situated in a public place or in 
> premises open to the public? for our own enjoyment and even for commercial 
> use. The MEP?s proposal is to adopt the model that operates in France and 
> a number of other European countries which gives other creators e.g. 
> architects and sculptors, protection against having their work being 
> reproduced without payment. In those countries  permission is required to 
> photograph or exploit images containing those works. The more 
> sensationalist press reports have suggested that the public?s holiday 
> snaps might be threatened - the reality is that it would mostly affect 
> groups such as travel book, postcard and poster publishers, in particular. 
> Either way, it is a significant concern to The Society.
>  
> The MEP?s proposal is only for commercial use and it is a very long way 
> from becoming law but The Society believes that the proposal should be 
> dismissed before it gains any traction. If harmonisation is required then 
> it should be along the UK model and not the other for which there has been 
> no great demand for other than by a small number of vested interests. In 
> the UK there is no demand to change the current position even from groups 
> such as architects who might benefit.
>  
> The Society would encourage members to sign a change.org 
> <http://change.org/> petition here 
> <https://www.change.org/p/european-parliament-save-the-freedom-of-photography-savefop-europarl-en?recruiter=293430649&utm_campaign=signature_receipt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=share_petition>
>  to register your objection to the proposal. Almost 300,000 people across 
> Europe have already signed. You may also wish to contact your own MEP 
> <http://www.europarl.org.uk/en/your-meps.html> to register your views. 
>  
> The Society has been working with a number of other organisations over the 
> past couple of weeks on this issue and the next key date is 9 July when 
> there will be a vote in the European Parliament on the report. 
>  
> There will be a blog posting about this issue on The Society?s website 
> shortly.  If you have any comments ? for or against ? please email me at: 
> director at rps.org <mailto:director at rps.org>  
>  
> Thank you for taking the time to read this email.  
>  
> Regards
>  
> Dr Michael Pritchard FRPS
> Director-General
> The Royal Photographic Society
> Direct line: +44 (0)1225 325730
>  
>  
>  
>  
> Unsubscribe <mailto:rpshq at rps.org?subject=Unsubscribe>
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> The Royal Photographic Society, Fenton House, 122 Wells Road, Bath, BA2 
> 3AH, UK. 
> Tel: +44(0)1225 325733.    VAT Registration No. GB 753 3057 41   
> Registered Charity No. 1107831
> Any information contained herein or in any attachment(s) is intended only 
> for the named recipient. Under no circumstances should it be distributed, 
> disclosed, copied or transmitted to other parties without the express 
> permission of The Society. Any views expressed in this message are those 
> of the sender and may not reflect the views of The Royal Photographic 
> Society. If you are not the intended recipient please notify The Society 
> immediately and delete it from your system.   This email has been scanned 
> for viruses by MailDefender.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Scanned by Mail Titan - managed email security from Westgate IT



Replies: Reply from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] The RPS and Freedom of Panorama)