Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/07/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] "new" equipment
From: wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr)
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:57:54 -0700 (GMT-07:00)

Nope, I've shredded the credit card.  Ain't gonna do it.  Can't make me.  
LaLaLaLa.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
http://doug-herr.fineartamerica.com


-----Original Message-----
>From: Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at gmail.com>
>Sent: Jul 17, 2015 11:54 AM
>To: LUG Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>Subject: Re: [Leica] "new" equipment
>
>Doug, 
>
>new Sony, avail in Sacto  Aug 5 at Mikes. J street
>
>
>s
>
>
>
>
>> On Jul 17, 2015, at 10:19 AM, Doug Herr <wildlightphoto at earthlink.net> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Don Dory wrote:
>> 
>>>>> 
>> The Canon 500 is probably your best bet unless you spend into
>> the Leica APO modular lenses which cost as much as your truck.
>> <<<
>> 
>> Have you seen my truck?  The Leica Modular APO lenses are worth 3-4 times 
>> what my truck is worth ;)  Weight is probably similar.
>> 
>> 
>>>>> 
>> I would figure out what corrections need to be made to color and contrast 
>> and just
>> apply a global correction to any images taken with the 500 in LR or 
>> whatever
>> software you are using to do RAW conversion.  Once you dial in the
>> correction then doing a global fix is pretty easy to add to your work 
>> flow.
>> <<<
>> 
>> OK thanks.  I just have to work out what those corrections are.
>> 
>>>>> 
>> As to the Sony, I believe it is currently the best solution to someone 
>> with
>> lenses from several vendors;
>> <<<
>> 
>> I agree!  I expect to be using LeiCaNikon lenses on it.  I have no plans 
>> for a native-mount lens until Zeiss makes a 500mm f/4 Tele-Apotessar for 
>> it, and even then I'll check the weight, price & responsiveness.
>> 
>> Overall I'm quite pleased with the a7II.  The a7rII will be very enticing 
>> once the inevitable new-camera bugs are worked out of it and 
>> "undocumented features" are discovered and work-arounds found.  The one 
>> thing I haven't worked out yet on the a7II is how to reverse the 
>> direction of the shutter speed control dial, currently configured to the 
>> front dial.  It turns the opposite direction vs. the R8 and my head is 
>> balking at that.  The rear dial isn't an option because of tendonitis in 
>> my right thumb.
>> 
>> 
>> Bob Adler wrote:
>> 
>>>>> 
>> Seems, by testing the Canon on different sensors, that this issue is 
>> inherent in the lens. Basically that leaves you searching for a software 
>> solution.
>> <<<
>> 
>> Yup. that's what I'm looking for.
>> 
>>>>> 
>> Things that seem to PPP to mind are using that free Adobe software to 
>> calibrate the lens to, using a Mcbeth color chart to also figure out what 
>> you need to do in your raw processing to get the real chart to look like 
>> the file you create, or go to a different lens and use lense cast removal 
>> software for varying or critical apertures (Capture One has this) and 
>> apply this to your images. Some kind of software workaround for a 
>> hardware problem?
>> <<<
>> 
>> OK this gives me some ideas, thanks Bob.
>> 
>> Doug Herr
>> Birdman of Sacramento
>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>> http://doug-herr.fineartamerica.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information