Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/07/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Voigtlander Nokton 1.1 yes or no?
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:33:58 -0500
References: <C100AA41-150A-4240-9DC3-B6A553D1A8A5@gmail.com> <DA460484-E037-424F-B6D9-DAC98A8E5F45@gmail.com> <CAF8hL-FG4oOC4rSYs1xy2bJqVDZ8f+N6cycF4zK=bD8DgJrMWQ@mail.gmail.com> <4E97371C-5A07-4843-90AE-410E42123DD8@gmail.com> <CAF8hL-FQj1t9-zhjC7Z1yQThhzOi6u7quJ7x5+Tc-xDF1cy+Vw@mail.gmail.com> <63730231-070F-40C1-B37F-E25AF76C5FB6@gmail.com> <CAHgrdCQOkvmdeM9X2bAwNF=EJ1rDeC94D4KzbWe0rBWaWZSG9A@mail.gmail.com>

The 50/2 collapsible Summicron is a very nice lens if one can find it 
without cleaning marks. 

An current alternative is also the Voigtlander 50/2 Heliar. Not as sharp as 
the 50/1.5 Nokton, but more pleasing bokeh. 

Jeffery

> On Jul 21, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Jeff Moore <jbmmllug at jbm.org> wrote:
> 
> The Zeiss ZMs are good modern optics at very fair lower-than-Leica prices.
> 
> For a lovely classic-optic look (but with the possibility of getting
> chosen things quite nicely detailed, if you put them in the middle)
> I'm a fan of the pre-ASPH 50 Summilux.  But I don't know where prices
> for those are these days.
> 
> I also haven't done an extensive study of how mine focuses relative to
> where the rangefinder thinks it's focused, but I don't recall having
> been annoyed by it a lot.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> I agree that it isn?t very versatile, and exists only to give the 50s 
>> Sonnar look. It is best for faces (which is Kyle?s favorite subject). As 
>> Chris suggested, the Planar is sharper but maybe a little harsh.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 21, 2015, at 1:58 PM, Richard Man <richard at 
>>> richardmanphoto.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> But Jeff, if it is optimized for 1.5, then you have to rely on DoF to get
>>> focus for other aperture. It just does not make sense to use this lens.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> They can optimize it for f/1.5 free of charge if it is still under
>>>> warranty. It's the same optical formula as the 50 1.5 Sonnar from the 
>>>> 1950s.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 21, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Richard Man <richard at 
>>>>> richardmanphoto.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> The Zeiss 50/1,5 makes no sense to me. If you need to use it @F 2.8,, 
>>>>> why
>>>>> not just get an Elmar?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at 
>>>>> gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Or the Zeiss 50/1.5 Sonnar. It has some focus shift, so stop it down 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> 2.8. Optimized for f/2.8.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/b8wqqca
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 2015, at 1:17 PM, kyle cassidy on the LUG <
>>>>>> leicaslacker at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi folks --
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My trusty $100 Canon Serenar has picked up a slight wobble, I'm not
>>>> sure
>>>>>> if this is a portent of evil to come or if I just never noticed it
>>>> before --
>>>>>> but the front element section will move around a bit if you wiggle it
>>>>>> ("stop wiggling it!" advice I thank you for in advance).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm thinking of preemptively replacing it. I was going to go for a
>>>>>> Voigtlander 1.5, which seem to be about $900 in Leica M mount, but
>>>> noticed
>>>>>> that the Nokton 1.1 was going for about $650 -- any thoughts on 
>>>>>> whether
>>>> the
>>>>>> nokton would work as my only 50 or is it too big for every day use?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Suggestions of other 50's you have lying around in drawers and want 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>> get rid of also taken.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Priorities are:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 1) no slower than f2
>>>>>>> 2) focusing closer than 3 feet (which means any screwmount 50 is in,
>>>>>> though I'd prefer an M mount that I could focus closer without having 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> resort to the penny-shim trick.)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>>>>> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
>>>>> // https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com>
>>> // http://facebook.com/richardmanphoto
>>> // https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from boulanger.croissant at gmail.com (Peter Klein) ([Leica] Voigtlander Nokton 1.1 yes or no?)
In reply to: Message from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy on the LUG) ([Leica] Voigtlander Nokton 1.1 yes or no?)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Voigtlander Nokton 1.1 yes or no?)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Voigtlander Nokton 1.1 yes or no?)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Voigtlander Nokton 1.1 yes or no?)
Message from richard at richardmanphoto.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Voigtlander Nokton 1.1 yes or no?)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Voigtlander Nokton 1.1 yes or no?)
Message from jbmmllug at jbm.org (Jeff Moore) ([Leica] Voigtlander Nokton 1.1 yes or no?)