Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/08/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't know how large a print, but you are resolving an object about 5m high at about 500 m, ie about 0.57 degrees, the individual components of the bell tower - which is what it is - are probably about 2 - 5cm thick. I double two to three times from the large image before I loose resolution. The bell towers were made that way to stop the winds destroying them. Peter On 02/08/2015 22:01, Howard Ritter wrote: > I?ll circle it on the calendar. Speaking of Gordes, did you see my photo > of it in the album, taken same day as S?nanque? > > To see just one of the reasons I?m so fond of the NEX-7 and its kit zoom, > view the image large and use Control-+ (at least on a Mac) to further > embiggen the image so you can get a good look at the smallest detail in > the metalwork on the peak of the tallest building. Then estimate the size > of the equivalent print you?d be looking at, up close. I?m guessing 36 x > 54 inches. > > ?howard > > >> On Aug 2, 2015, at 4:21 PM, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com> >> wrote: >> >> Sorry should have typed "July" >> >> Peter >> >> On 01/08/2015 01:45, Howard Ritter wrote: >>> Ah, another LUGger who?s been there! We should get up a reunion for peak >>> lavender 2016. >>> >>> ?howard__________________ > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- =========================================================== Dr Peter Dzwig