Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/09/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135
From: leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans)
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 16:29:18 -0700
References: <55E496ED.2000309@lighttube.net> <55E4A313.2040705@hemenway.com> <55E4C1BC.4060105@gmx.de> <BLU173-DS736EB30A414014FD8203CB86A0@phx.gbl> <55E5CE5B.5060003@lighttube.net> <F98FD1AC-15E8-4FDD-9FB8-923A0E8FF3FC@gmail.com> <00ad01d0e4d7$1beaab10$53c00130$@verizon.net> <C99F1400-72C9-4A6C-A4CA-8796B9EF9E0C@gmail.com>

The rollie/zeiss is NOT M42.  It is the Rollie bayonet mount.  I think it 
was called QBM or something like that.  You would have to find an adapter 
for the Fuji or Sony.

Aram Langhans
(Semi) Retired  Science Teacher
& Unemployed photographer
 
?The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin himself 
would ever have dared dream.?   James D. Watson

-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Barbour [mailto:steve.barbour at gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 10:09 AM
To: LUG
Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135

so Frank,  I want to be sure I?ve got it, this lens, a 135/4 takumar/ rollei 
/zeiss unit is basically an M 42 pentax screw mount lens ?   

These adapters are available for both Fuji X and Sony A7. 

Et voila?that?s it?

thank you

steve



> On Sep 1, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Frank Filippone <red735i at verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> The Takumar is probably an M42 screw mount lens.  Many times referred 
> to as Pentax Screw Mount.  Or Universal screw mount.
> 
> Should cost you about $10 on FleaBay.
> 
> Wrong, $5 (Sony).   I looked it up.
> Fuji is $8
> 
> About the same as 1% of the TAX on a Leica body.
> 
> Frank Filippone
> Red735i at verizon.net
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+red735i=verizon.net at leica-users.org] On 
> Behalf Of Steve Barbour
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2015 9:47 AM
> To: LUG
> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135
> 
> 
>> On Sep 1, 2015, at 9:12 AM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols at lighttube.net> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi, Aram.
>> 
>> Thanks for the kind words.  I have an M42 bellows, and also a set of
> extension tubes, but I don't recall trying the 135 on there.  That's 
> something else to but on the bucket list.
> 
> 
> 
> is there an adapter so this lens can be used on a Fuji X or Sony A7 ?
> 
> 
> 
> steve
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>> 
>> On 9/1/2015 10:46 AM, Aram Langhans wrote:
>>> Douglas. When I was shooting Rollei's I had that 135/4 Tessar.  It 
>>> indeed
> was a great lens.  I would put it on bellows and that was my go-to 
> Macro setup.
>>> 
>>> Jim.  The butterfly photos are amazing.  That Takumar seems to be a 
>>> very
> nice lens.  Have you tried it on a bellows?
>>> 
>>> Aram
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message----- From: Douglas Sharp
>>> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2015 2:06 PM
>>> To: Leica Users Group
>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135
>>> 
>>> Bl?ody good lens. bloody good photos!
>>> 
>>> I like the colour rendition of Takumars - not as clinical as Leica 
>>> and not as cool and calculating as Zeiss.
>>> 
>>> One of my favourite 135s is the Takumar 135/2.5 in M42 mount - comes 
>>> close behind a Yashica 135/2.8 with CY-mount and a miniscule 135/4 
>>> from Voigtl?nder/Rollei which really sparkles.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Douglas
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 31.08.2015 20:55, Jim Hemenway wrote:
>>>> The second one Jim, it's somewhat magical.
>>>> 
>>>> Jim
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 8/31/15 2:03 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>>>>> I captured images of two more passing butterflies using a 
>>>>> combination
> with which I am beginning to feel more comfortable, the Oly E1 and the 
> Pentax 135/3.5, shot wide open.  Both were shot at very close to the 
> near focus limit.  Colors are just as they came from the ORF file.
>>>>> 
>>>>> A Black Swallowtail on the Buddleia Bush 
>>>>> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Black+Swallowtail+E1T
>>>>> a
>>>>> k.TIFF.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> And a Gulf Fritillary, same bush
>>>>> http://www.gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Gulf+Fritillary+E1+Ta
>>>>> k
>>>>> .TIFF.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please view the last one Large.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Comments and critiques welcomed.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more 
>>>> information
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135)
In reply to: Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135)
Message from jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135)
Message from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135)
Message from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135)
Message from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135)
Message from red735i at verizon.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135)
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] IMG: Flutterbys Using the Takumar 135)