Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/10/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...
From: ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 13:32:36 -0400
References: <13941AF8-16E8-4F64-AE4D-D0CA87F40BB6@btinternet.com> <D24403C2.49DCD%mark@rabinergroup.com> <03e301d106a3$2d4a3950$87deabf0$@mcmaster.fr>

genuine answers:

panoramas

I like the crop tool that let?s me square up photos


ric



> On Oct 14, 2015, at 1:10 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:
> 
> What do you do with your pictures in Photoshop that cannot be done in
> Lightroom? Genuine question.
> 
> I have used PS since early versions, looking at 2015 CC there is little
> comparison to earlier versions so why hark back to LR v1?
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> I do have Lightroom 1 since 2006 its still loaded on this computer and it
> was the second version which really made it viable for image processing  as
> well as browsing and organizing. The image manipulation stuff in this first
> version is very minimal a few tweaks and they told you up front you'd be 
> for
> sure opening it in Photoshop with a touch of a button. I think it sold like
> hotcakes and plenty of people have no intention of opening their images up
> in anything if they really didn't have to and doing anything to them.  So
> Lightroom became the digital program for digital photography and they added
> the world "Photoshop" to it.
> 
> I asked a gal in a caf? sitting next to me if she used Photoshop. She said
> yes. She used LightRoom.
> 
> History of LightRoom:
> 
> http://www.mosaicarchive.com/2012/10/24/the-history-of-lightroom/
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/14/15 11:25 AM, "Frank Dernie" <Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Not so Mark.
>> 
>> Even the first version of Lightroom had most of the photo-relevant 
>> manipulation capabilities of the then current version of Photoshop.
>> 
>> It did have these functions organised differently, and added a 
>> cataloging system suitable for photographers, but it was by no means just
> a browser.
>> 
>> Who told you that it was a browser with add-ons as an afterthought? 
>> Somebody has been really pulling the wool!
>> 
>> cheers,
>> Frank
>> 
>> 
>>> On 14 Oct 2015, at 15:37, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> As LightRoom was designed to be a browser which as an afterthought 
>>> had some picture "editing" as in processing: cropping etc 
>>> capabilities put in as an afterthought and then developed with later
> versions.
>>> 
>>> Photoshop itself was first designed as a program to make it so you 
>>> could change a Tiff file to a Jpeg or other file formats back and forth.
>>> When you do that the image would sometimes darken or lighten.
>>> So they had to put controls in there to tweak that.
>>> Hence Photoshop. It had another name at first.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)
In reply to: Message from Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)
Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] (SPAM: ?) Re: If not Lightroom, ...)