Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Which R lenses are good? Mediocre? Bad?
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 16:04:43 -0600
References: <20057528.1446564385844.JavaMail.root@elwamui-milano.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <D25E920C.4C1B8%mark@rabinergroup.com> <029001d11680$4f3e4140$edbac3c0$@mcmaster.fr>

Three things:

There's no shame in selling a lens that no longer suits your needs.

and

Erwin Puts is a valuable resource of opinion.

and

Not all good old boys are dumb, few are rude.




-----Original Message-----
>
> I certainly am not impressed when I look at a chat group and one person is
> saying  "I found the 90mm to be a bit flat" countered by another person
> saying "yea the 100 is much sharper" with a URL pointing to a jpg of his
> kid
> or grand kid low rez to put it mildly as you can just make out if its maybe
> in focus or not. And both people have long ago sold it and gotten something
> else. Which they then sold.
>
> Whenever Erwin's name is brought up on the LUG the same two idiots chime in
> about how he's paid off by Leica and a number of other dumb rude good old
> boy stuff. Its absurd and a damn shame people who take this stuff seriously
> cant get the respect they certainly deserve and get everywhere else.
>
>
>
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photographer
>



Regards,

Sonny
http://sonc.com/look/
Natchitoches, Louisiana
1714
Oldest Permanent Settlement in the Louisiana Purchase

USA


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Which R lenses are good? Mediocre? Bad?)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Which R lenses are good? Mediocre? Bad?)
Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] Which R lenses are good? Mediocre? Bad?)