Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2015/11/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGS: Comparing SL and M240 and 19R and Noctilux
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 14:55:47 -0600
References: <CA+yJO1D=cphW6jKE02H0j-oyU7gYq_kkXUH6JHij+rV+puQ-TA@mail.gmail.com>

Tina,

It is difficult for me to make comparisons of images from two cameras 
when one is shot at f/6.8 and the other at f/2.  I think you need to 
select common settings for such comparisons to have any real meaning.  
DoF  makes a big difference.

Just my 2 cents.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA

On 11/30/2015 2:34 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> PESO:
>
> I took some photos in the rain to compare the SL with the R19/2.8, the SL
> with the 35/2.0 Summicron and the M240 with the Summicron.  As I was
> carrying the cameras out to the deck, I passed the kitchen scale so I
> weighed them.  The SL with no lens weighed 966 grams.  The M240 with the
> 35/2.0 attached weighed 961 grams, so not a huge difference.
>
> When I attach the M lenses, the SL automatically recognized the coded
> lenses with no further attention from me.  When I attach the R lenses, I go
> to the menu and tell it which R lens is attached.  It recognizes the lens
> but does not record the correct aperture.  I know I took several at F/8 and
> used hyperfocal focusing, but none of them came up as having f/8 for the
> aperture.
>
> The SL is much easier to focus.  I tried out both the magnifying in the EVF
> and the focus peaking.  Both work fine but the magnified EVF is much easier
> to see.  You press the bottom right button once and it zooms to 100% in the
> EVF, press it twice and it zooms to 200%.  Focus and touch the shutter
> button and it zooms back out and takes the photo.
>
> With the auto-focus SL lens, there are several focusing formats to choose
> from in the SL and  you can also touch the screen and have it focus there
> or move the toggle switch (they call it the joystick) next to the EFG to
> choose a focus spot.  I find the screen and the toggle switch to be easiest
> and fastest.  But these are all manually focused with M and R lenses.
>
> The first one is an experiment with the Noctilux last night using the
> magnified EVF to focus on Tom's eyelashes instead of the glasses frame.
>
> http://www.pbase.com/image/161961923
>
> The next three are straight from the camera as DNGs, converted to jpegs as
> they are exported with no other adjustments.
>
> Leica SL with 19/2.8 Elmarit R:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/161961755
>
> Leica SL with 35/2.0 Summicron M:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/161961757
>
> Leica M240 with 35/2.0 Summicron M:
>
> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/161961758
>
> I did some bracketed exposures and merged the photos for HDR with each
> camera and each lens.  These are adjusted for color and exposure:
>
> *http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/leica_sl&page=7
> <http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/leica_sl&page=7>*
>
> The SL will also bracket the 3 exposures as DNGs and make a merged jpeg
> from them automatically.  I found those needed more adjusting than making
> them myself.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Tina
>
>



Replies: Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] IMGS: Comparing SL and M240 and 19R and Noctilux)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Comparing SL and M240 and 19R and Noctilux)
In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Comparing SL and M240 and 19R and Noctilux)