Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?
From: photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 12:06:22 +0100
References: <85CF3294-5166-4C64-9317-FBC5683AA90B@gmail.com> <04A121903231481385EA67DB4DACE377@Family>

:-)

Amities
Philippe


Le 5 janv. 2016 ? 12:03, "Douglas Barry" <imra at iol.ie> a ?crit :

> More an Amard to us Eurocentrics :-)
> 
> A good one though with a lot of activity and interaction!
> 
> Douglas
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philippe" <photo.philippe.amard at 
> gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2016 5:50 PM
> Subject: [Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?
> 
> 
>> I was editing my Xmas photos when I hit upon this one which reminded me 
>> of N. Rockwell's compositions, and of E. Hopper's use of artificial light.
>> 
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/2015-Noel+__+Mutz-Hopper+CLR-1722.jpg.html
>> 
>> Does it work for you? or not?
>> 
>> All comments and suggestions most welcome.
>> 
>> Amities
>> Philippe
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?)
Message from imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry) ([Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?)