Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?
From: imra at iol.ie (Douglas Barry)
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:03:43 -0000
References: <85CF3294-5166-4C64-9317-FBC5683AA90B@gmail.com>
 
More an Amard to us Eurocentrics :-)

A good one though with a lot of activity and interaction!

Douglas

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Philippe" <photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2016 5:50 PM
Subject: [Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?


>I was editing my Xmas photos when I hit upon this one which reminded me of 
>N. Rockwell's compositions, and of E. Hopper's use of artificial light.
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/2015-Noel+__+Mutz-Hopper+CLR-1722.jpg.html
>
> Does it work for you? or not?
>
> All comments and suggestions most welcome.
>
> Amities
> Philippe
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp) ([Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?)
Reply from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?)
 In reply to: Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] IMG: Hopper? or Rockwell? neither?)