Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, I do see the difference in the actual slides. For many years, photographers chose their slide films based on what they were shooting and what color palette and film speed and grain structure they could get with certain films. I used Kodachrome almost exclusively up until Kodak turned the processing over to Qualex. Qualex ruined Kodachrome processing and routinely sent me slides contaminated with chemical splotches, cut between the frames, and severely over or under developed. I gave up, bought a Jobo processor and switched to all E-6 films. I came to like some of them - Provia and Astia in particular - but none of them ever equaled my old Kodachrome 64 :-( Gone but not forgotten!! Tina On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:42 PM, lluisripollphotography < lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote: > Tina, > > If you look at the original slides or you project them, do you appreciate > such tonal differences? in my opinion the tonal range on the original > slides is better than the results when its scanned. I agree with you that > Velvia made great tones for the landscapes and Kodachrome for the skin > tones, when I scan I have similar problems and with Ektachrome the tonal > range trend to blue. > > Lluis > > > > > > El 26 gen 2016, a les 0:31, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> va > escriure: > > > > Thanks, Lluis. I think that is a characteristic of Kodachrome. I've > > always loved the skin tones that you get with Kodachrome, but I prefer > > Velvia for landscapes. Could that be it? > > > > Tina > > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:00 PM, lluisripollphotography < > > lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > >> Tina, > >> > >> For me this one is an example of cold colors, I don?t find the words to > >> define why they look for me more unreal than the pictures with warm > colors > >> > >> <http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/162411109> > >> > >> and this one of warm colors, in my opinion these colors looks much more > >> natural and rich as they are > >> > >> <http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/162410997> > >> > >> Cheers > >> Lluis > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> El 25 gen 2016, a les 23:49, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> va > >> escriure: > >>> > >>> Can you give me an example of the cold colors not working? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Tina > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, lluisripollphotography < > >>> lluisripollphotography at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Tina, > >>>> > >>>> Already commented, but I insist. The images with warm colors, as well > >>>> those of Faviana, works perfect in the scanning process, the colors > >> look as > >>>> they are, but on the images with cold colors, green or light blue, > >> reflect > >>>> unreal colors, If in the same image are warm and cold colors and the > >> warm > >>>> ones has an important proportion on the global image the overall color > >> of > >>>> the image is good. > >>>> > >>>> This is the question we was talking yesterday, why? It looks as the > >>>> scanner make a wrong reading of white balance with cold colors? > >>>> > >>>> Can someone explain this? > >>>> > >>>> Lluis > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> El 24 gen 2016, a les 0:20, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> va > >>>> escriure: > >>>>> > >>>>> PESO: > >>>>> > >>>>> A few more Kodachromes: > >>>>> > >>>>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/2016&page=3 > >>>>> > >>>>> C&C greatly appreciated. > >>>>> > >>>>> Tina > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Tina Manley > >>>>> http:// > >>>>> < > >>>> > >> > http://t.sidekickopen35.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=540dc834-a12f-44bb-d194-a3440df02c0a > >>>>> > >>>>> www.tinamanley.com > >>>>> http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/ > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Leica Users Group. > >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Tina Manley > >>> http:// > >>> < > >> > http://t.sidekickopen35.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=4382a6dd-cd2b-4dae-8427-0eb4c74e348f > >>> > >>> www.tinamanley.com > >>> http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/ > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Leica Users Group. > >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Leica Users Group. > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Tina Manley > > http:// > > < > http://t.sidekickopen35.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=77d3bac8-a2bf-4de4-f769-915f6bcf3c8f > > > > www.tinamanley.com > > http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Tina Manley http:// <http://t.sidekickopen35.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJN7t5XYgfmKYPW4WzBHl3Mx_9dW3LqWkM56dQ1Jf7P8b5b02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftina-manley.artistwebsites.com%2F&si=6038418186567680&pi=f893a701-61a4-46e2-865c-fd252afafb47> www.tinamanley.com http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/