Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/02/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]They are completely static subjects..... john ________________________________________ They are to me. Tina On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:29 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: > Waste of time then, they are your cameras but what you show are not > worthwhile tests ;-) > > john > > ________________________________________ > > As I have said before, I do not do controlled tests on tripods. I do real > life tests the way I would use the cameras. Tripod tests would be of no > use to me since I never use a tripod. I hold the camera or prop it on the > nearest post. It works for me, maybe not for others. > > Tina > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:43 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote: > > > Not on a tripod so hard to compare (viewpoint changes), look for tonality > > differences at 320-1600asa as the 246 is better at +5000asa > > > > john > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > PESO: > > > > I did some tests with the Noctilux and Summilux on the MM and M246. I > > have a hard time telling the files apart. I did notice that neither > camera > > records the aperture correctly because all of the photos were either shot > > wide open or at F/8 and they were not recorded that way. I also shot > some > > with both cameras at ISO 6400 but that was not recorded either. The M246 > > files are about half the size of the MM files. These are the ones shot > > with the 50/1.4: > > > > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/162551679 > > > > and hit next until the end. These have absolutely nothing done to them > > except importing into LR as raw files and exporting to pBase as jpegs. > I'll > > post the Noctilux ones later. > > > > Tina > > > > -- > > Tina Manley > > www.tinamanley.com > > http://tina-manley.artistwebsites.com/ > > > >