Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] m9 vs m240?
From: leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:31:39 -0500

I'm thinking about upgrading from the m9 to the 240 ...

my main problems with the 9 are:

1) sloooow wakeup time. i'm often like "take the picture! take the
picture!" (mashes button, nothing happens, nothing happens ... bird flies
past ... long pause ... click!)

2) noisy iso -- anytying over 400 is almost useless

3) slow read time to the back of camera display

4) shutter is NOISY

5) slooow shutter winding time.

my m9 is doing ... ok, but i'm wondering if the 240 is appreciably more
awesome. i don't care about sapphire crystals or titanium body parts or
snake skin covers or whatever... just the things that make the camera work

thoughts?

kc


Replies: Reply from rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] m9 vs m240?)
Reply from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] m9 vs m240?)
Reply from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] m9 vs m240?)