Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] m9 vs m240?
From: rgacpa at gmail.com (Bob Adler)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 21:27:35 -0800
References: <CANiFQ-1O0-hzvh3-H0yziXkrxb9v8bTDxL_gBOvMLa1T26OB6w@mail.gmail.com>

Yes. It is awesome.

Bob Adler
Robert Adler Photography
www.robertadlerphotography.com

> On Mar 10, 2016, at 1:31 PM, kyle cassidy <leicaslacker at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I'm thinking about upgrading from the m9 to the 240 ...
> 
> my main problems with the 9 are:
> 
> 1) sloooow wakeup time. i'm often like "take the picture! take the
> picture!" (mashes button, nothing happens, nothing happens ... bird flies
> past ... long pause ... click!)
> 
> 2) noisy iso -- anytying over 400 is almost useless
> 
> 3) slow read time to the back of camera display
> 
> 4) shutter is NOISY
> 
> 5) slooow shutter winding time.
> 
> my m9 is doing ... ok, but i'm wondering if the 240 is appreciably more
> awesome. i don't care about sapphire crystals or titanium body parts or
> snake skin covers or whatever... just the things that make the camera work
> 
> thoughts?
> 
> kc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy) ([Leica] m9 vs m240?)