Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2016/06/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple
From: photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe)
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:10:06 +0200
References: <CA+yJO1BME6fyy_7BWPk_6uCaL-6DtqE7LOaS62OkuaPLth+rsA@mail.gmail.com> <15228353-13B7-47A7-9874-9A9974378473@frozenlight.eu> <CA+yJO1D56TUNzK-9VqsTRou07+KPgNwNB3+6uYcpE6DYz6AkNA@mail.gmail.com> <e7569003c26e4fa5a5d4d6e69f8451ba@WhizzEXM02.whizz.org> <AD0738C9-CF13-490B-8E36-8A6128EA03B8@gmail.com> <b051203872f1482d8c6c570a028ff0b8@WhizzEXM02.whizz.org> <CA+yJO1CnMoKY=4sn+rc+E9s9_5j1a0K1K3XcoR-YHNzX47W=+g@mail.gmail.com> <853464a6542a4de892e303fd40f502aa@WhizzEXM01.whizz.org> <45D4D742-8B1B-4BAF-A0FB-903D1D5F553C@gmail.com> <CA+yJO1DBGzNzJePgWRkyxLgx1Q=k-AoE+_CvFR44FLHFhqVxTw@mail.gmail.com> <f600aa0d511e41f7ab22832a2cabf38e@WhizzEXM01.whizz.org> <CA+yJO1AREe-5=Oz6-CSHPrvf405DJO8nV_wg0anWnaqCQCfGBQ@mail.gmail.com>

You sure are Tina! 

I downloaded and played a bit with the file - luminance of the blue color 
might be reduced -40 to -50
The ceiling of the vault above the window might gain using the graduated 
tool and decreasing the highlights.

I'd stop there as the metallic look/texture/feel/shine is now gone.

In any case, it is a very fine photo that I'd love to have taken myself.

Keep the good work coming

Amities
Philippe

Le 10 juin 2016 ? 16:01, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> a ?crit :

> I guess I'm not a photographer then.
> 
> Tina
> 
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:59 AM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:
> 
>> I have no doubt you are right, just the second is too manipulated for a
>> photographer to like IMO.... Can you not see quite a large difference
>> between the two?
>> 
>> john
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> OK, Guys -
>> 
>> This is what I am competing with:
>> 
>> https://www.google.com/search?q=zoroastrian+fire+temple&rlz=1C1CAFB_enUS636US636&espv=2&biw=1920&bih=1075&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjNyM_czJ3NAhURziYKHcMEBfoQ_AUIBigB
>> 
>> You have to stand out in the crowd if you are going to attract buyers.
>> 
>> Here is the original photo, straight from the camera, converted to jpeg:
>> 
>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/163424161
>> 
>> Here is the same photo, processed in Color Efex Pro with the saturation at
>> 6 (I also took out somebody's shoulder in the bottom right - shades of
>> McCurry!!):
>> 
>> http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/image/163424164
>> 
>> View at Original.  I don't think the differences are that great, but the
>> second one will sell better than the first.  I guarantee it.
>> 
>> Tina
>> 
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Philippe <photo.philippe.amard at 
>> gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Come on john, be a sport, Tina hasn't added more colour than you
>>> usually subtract ;-)
>>> 
>>> Amities from sunny Alsace
>>> Philippe
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le 10 juin 2016 ? 09:19, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> a ?crit :
>>> 
>>>> Even in a small JPEG they look processed to me :-(
>>>> 
>>>> john
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry you don't like it.  I do.
>>>> 
>>>> Tina
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 5:44 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Glad I do not in that case ;-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> john
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sometimes I use Color Efex Pro if I like the look. Have you looked
>>>>> at Stock sites lately?? Mine are very, very conservative!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tina
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jun 9, 2016, at 4:47 PM, John McMaster <john at mcmaster.fr> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So is that what gives what looks like boosted colours to many images?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> john
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks, Nathan.  I like that one.  I used Color Efex Pro applied a
>>>>> little stronger than usual because I thought a "painting" look
>>>>> would be appropriate.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Tina
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Nathan Wajsman
>>>>>>> <photo at frozenlight.eu>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> That image is beautiful. It looks like a painting.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Nathan
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 08 Jun 2016, at 00:15, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> PESO:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> We visited the Zoroastrian Fire Temple in Yazd for a worship
>> service.
>>>>>>>> Ordinarily, non-Zoroastrians are not allowed in the room where
>>>>>>>> the Victorious Fire (Khordeh Avesta) is located but we went with
>>>>>>>> our friends from the cucumber farm and they talked us in.
>>>>>>>> Everybody was very
>>>>>>> welcoming
>>>>>>>> once we got inside.  The rooms were very, very small and crowded
>>>>>>>> so photography was pretty difficult.  The fire itself is from 470
>> AD.
>>>>>>> Almost
>>>>>>>> unbelievable!!
>>>>>>> http://tinamanley.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/Iran/G0000YmlbTd
>>>>>>> dL
>>>>>>> 96
>>>>>>> g
>>>>>>> /I0000Y3UKBocfwEk
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> and hit previous for more.  I'm still having problems with the
>> lines.
>>>>>>>> Caitlyn from PhotoShelter affirmed that is not a problem with my
>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>> thinks the transmission might have some hiccups.  She suggested
>>>>>>>> I reload them all.  Which I will get around to doing eventually!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> "The *Yazd Atash Behram*, also known as *Yazd Atash Kadeh*), is
>>>>>>>> a temple
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> Yazd <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yazd>, to the west of Shiraz
>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiraz> in Iran. It was built in
>>>>>>>> 1934 and enshrines the Atash Bahram
>>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atash_Bahram>,
>>>>>>>> meaning ?Victorious Fire?, dated to 470 AD. The sacred fire is
>>>>>>>> installed
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>> the temple behind an amber tinted glass enclosure. Only
>>>>>>>> Zoroastrians are allowed to go to the sanctum area of the fire."
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> C&C greatly appreciated.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Tina
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Tina Manley
>>>>>>>> www.tinamanley.com
>>>>>>>> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
>>>>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tina Manley
> www.tinamanley.com
> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)
Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)
Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)
Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)
Message from photo.philippe.amard at gmail.com (Philippe) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)
Message from john at mcmaster.fr (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] IMGS: Zoroastrian Fire Temple)