Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/02/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Scanner advice sought
From: jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman)
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 13:32:12 -0500
References: <1b390469-b3d3-6d3b-9129-82a0be207ded@summaventures.com> <8302FB32-9D7C-402C-A613-C7E955C30478@mac.com> <57a6cedf-42a1-6b8a-5c77-a5a90bede82b@summaventures.com> <BLUPR19MB0338619F882EC963B41CB0F2C1430@BLUPR19MB0338.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <CAGHtf7HjYpNXDQHd3gVrScsAYDG6reYeJMrVg5d3kV+aF3R=jA@mail.gmail.com>

I second that.  On my second V600, and just love it.

-----Original Message-----
From: LUG [mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] On
Behalf Of Gene Duprey
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 1:19 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Scanner advice sought

There is the Epson V600 scanner, which i have and am happy with.

Gene


On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Yang Zou <iaeaix at outlook.com> wrote:

> Nikon coolscan is the best bet but it is pricy.
> For 35mm, 5000 ED is the top model but also the most pricy. If only
> B&W is needed, 4000ED is a good choice
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2017, 3:34 PM -0500, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com>,
> wrote:
> Firmware...I don't have access to the scanner's firmware. Do you mean
> the
> W10
> drivers?
>
> Peter
>
> On 06/02/2017 23:44, Stephen Barbour wrote:
> Male sure you are using correct firmware.
>
> s
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 6, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com>
wrote:
>
> Richard's comments about his scanner is timely.
>
> I am trying to scan old negs as a prelude to doing some film work. I
> had - and used to use successfully - an EPSON Perfection 2400. However
> not having used it for several years it failed to work properly when I
> tried it under W10, so I am looking round for a new scanner to handle
> B&W 35mm film.
>
> Anyone any suggestions?
>
> Criteria: High quality and high resolution; able to handle strips as
> well as rolls; accurate; must produce TIFFs as well as other formats
> such as JPEGs; good tools desirable but not absolutely necessary given
> the present state of PS etc.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Peter
> --
>
> ===========================================================
> Dr Peter Dzwig
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> --
>
> ===========================================================
> Dr Peter Dzwig
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Scanner advice sought)
Message from stevebarbour at mac.com (Stephen Barbour) ([Leica] Scanner advice sought)
Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Scanner advice sought)
Message from iaeaix at outlook.com (Yang Zou) ([Leica] Scanner advice sought)
Message from geneduprey2015 at gmail.com (Gene Duprey) ([Leica] Scanner advice sought)