Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/05/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I disagree! I think low light performance is much better with SL! Tina Sent from my iPhone > On May 6, 2017, at 3:13 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Tina. I found this and thought it was helpful: > http://cameradecision.com/compare/Leica-M-Typ-240-vs-Leica-SL > though not as helpful as talking with you! > > I am a bit confused where they say the 240 does better in low light, but > the SL has higher ISO. Not sure how to interpret their low light > performance numbers. > Thanks, > Bob > > Bob Adler > www.robertadlerphotography.com > >> On May 6, 2017, at 9:37 AM, Leo Wesson <leowesson at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Bob, >> >> Are you not considering the M10? >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Leo Wesson >> Leowesson.com >> 817-733-9157 >> >>> On May 6, 2017, at 11:29, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> If you Google M240 sensor compared to SL sensor, you will get lots of >>> comparisons. Ditto with M lenses on both. >>> >>> Good luck! >>> >>> Tina >>> >>>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Desire the zooms for travel... >>>> >>>> Bob Adler >>>> www.robertadlerphotography.com >>>> >>>>> On May 5, 2017, at 9:15 PM, Richard Man <richard at >>>>> richardmanphoto.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I don't have the SL, nor even the M240, but is "image quality, vs the >>>> M240, >>>>> significantly improved with M lenses" to be your primary objective? If >>>> so, >>>>> I can't imagine how the SL would be significantly better than the M240 >>>> with >>>>> M lens. >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello all. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm contemplating selling some gear (M240, M21mm/1,4 ASPH, Sony A7r II >>>>>> modified by Kolarivision for Leica WA lenses) plus some cash for an SL >>>> and >>>>>> the 24-90. >>>>>> >>>>>> Two questions: >>>>>> 1. Given a large collection of recent generation M lenses, are there >>>>>> any >>>>>> known issues? MINOR degradation at the corners of images made with WA >>>>>> lenses used wide open are not a big deal to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> 2. Is there a noticeable positive difference in raw files? What >>>>>> differences (positive or negative). >>>>>> >>>>>> Bottom line, is the image quality, vs the M240, significantly improved >>>>>> with M lenses to warrant this move? Not really talking about the >>>>>> differences in how one works with the two systems. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in advance for your input, >>>>>> Bob >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bob Adler >>>>>> www.robertadlerphotography.com >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> "Some People Drive, We Are Driven" >>>>> // richard <http://www.richardmanphoto.com> >>>>> richardmanphoto on Facebook and Instagram >>>>> <https://instagram.com/richardmanphoto> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Tina Manley >>> www.tinamanley.com >>> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com >>> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information