Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/08/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Film exposure error - how to correct it
From: pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig)
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:11:53 +0100
References: <6d78d76f-12f9-6478-b8b4-4c7eede3176f@summaventures.com> <0E3363FA-46BC-4045-9308-FC56E2807215@frozenlight.eu>

Thanks Nathan.

Peter

On 16/08/2017 12:31, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> As someone else has suggested, you should probably decide based on the 
> relative importance of the images. Also, assuming that you are going to 
> scan the negatives, I think it is easier to deal with underexposed than 
> overexposed images, which would imply developing for 125 and dealing with 
> the underexposed images at the scanning stage.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu <http://www.frozenlight.eu/>
> http:// <http://www.greatpix.eu/>www.greatpix.eu
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws 
> <http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws>Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/ 
> <http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/>
> Cycling: http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator 
> <http://www.crazyguyonabike.com/belgiangator>
> YNWA
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 16 Aug 2017, at 11:21, Peter Dzwig <pdzwig at summaventures.com> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I put my M3 back in to use over the vacation. I was exposing the film in 
>> it as
>> ASA400 assuming that I had one of my usual films in it.
>>
>> HOWEVER ( :-( ) I found that I had a roll of 125 ASA FP4+ in it when I 
>> came to
>> the end of the roll. When I started using it I had noticed that I had 
>> already
>> exposed some 10 frames. So I have 10 frames exposed at 125 ASA and 25 - or
>> thereabouts - exposed as 400 ASA. Most of the shots taken when I was 
>> assuming it
>> was 400 were exposed in the region of f8 - f16 at 1/500th.
>>
>> I send film to Ilford to process. My question is: how should I tell them 
>> to
>> develop it?
>>
>> I think I have the following options:
>>
>> (i) DON'T - just bin it and write it off to bad luck!
>>
>> (ii) Develop it as (say) 200 ASA, accept that some will be under-exposed 
>> and
>> that the rest will be over exposed and sort it out when I scan the film 
>> and play
>> with it in PS or NikFX (or whatever). The short exposure times on the 400 
>> ASA
>> shots may help as they will be on he darker side.
>>
>> (iii) Develop it as one or the other (125 or 400 ASA)
>>
>> Any other thoughts/recommendations?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>> PS I know that I should shoot a whole roll before i forget what the film 
>> is and
>> go off on autopilot :-)
>> -- 
>>
>> ===========================================================
>> Dr Peter Dzwig                               
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> .
> 

-- 

===========================================================
Dr Peter Dzwig                          



In reply to: Message from pdzwig at summaventures.com (Peter Dzwig) ([Leica] Film exposure error - how to correct it)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Film exposure error - how to correct it)