Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2017/09/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Interesting article on digitizing film
From: ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter)
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 20:24:32 -0400
References: <DM3PR10MB0924AE3A813645DE79ADFA34B86A0@DM3PR10MB0924.namprd10.prod.outlook.com> <5A4B0A8E-C0C2-481B-AC10-91F5D1191511@gmail.com> <87FEFEEC-F0A2-41D0-9A3F-90A8D838365B@twc.com> <CA+yJO1BrrQnRdV9ezV05A2pDvO-_msp=Q=zrx1H4yjyoLP9jcQ@mail.gmail.com> <FC260A5F-2917-4DFB-BA04-2D366FAB0842@twc.com> <CA+yJO1Df_p2N+FJ2MNPYyeaOMOQr0wLz=Sdvww6ugEy3oKNSQQ@mail.gmail.com> <4174F071-8DC6-43AB-9D04-AB2F248F1F18@cartersxrd.net> <3209AA25-0037-4C31-A4D7-B3E4C11516D6@gmail.com>

thanks

ric


> On Sep 9, 2017, at 8:20 PM, Sonny Carter <sonc.hegr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I thought the same thing, but it is vastly better than film copying. My 
> guess is you're not doubling the grain, nor getting any grain shadow (I'm 
> not sure that's the term).
> 
> It really shines as a technique in copying 2 1/4 or 4 x5 negs, far better 
> than the transparency adapter on my big ole Epson 11000.
> 
> from my iPad
> 
> Sonny Carter
> 
>> On Sep 9, 2017, at 6:48 PM, RicCarter <ric at cartersxrd.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Maybe this is a great idea?I don?t know.
>> 
>> But, I don?t remember ever getting really good results with slide copying 
>> (which I did pretty often). It escapes me how doing it to a sensor 
>> instead would be superior to film.
>> 
>> ric
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 9, 2017, at 7:23 PM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Absolutely, Howard. That's exactly what I'm facing.  The Nikon LS5000 
>>> with
>>> the bulk loader can scan all of my Kodachromes quickly and it has.  I 
>>> have
>>> thousands of scans made with the LS5000 in my files.  I'm now trying to
>>> work on them.  I'm finding lots of blooming highlights that ruin the 
>>> scan.
>>> Less than perfect color balance.  I'm not sure if the blooming on the
>>> highlights is due to the scanner needing cleaning or not, but I've had it
>>> cleaned and cleaned it myself several times.  I was very skeptical about
>>> the value of digital scans but I have changed my mind and think that is
>>> probably the way to go.
>>> 
>>> Tina
>>> 
>>>> On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Howard L Ritter Jr <hlritter at 
>>>> twc.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Tina?
>>>> 
>>>> That?s very interesting, and maybe disappointing, as it means that I 
>>>> might
>>>> have to do manual copying. It?s probably faster to do it manually, but 
>>>> the
>>>> Coolscan has the advantages of unattended operation for a full box of
>>>> slides and automatic naming of the scans.
>>>> 
>>>> How is the macro?s performance better? Resolution? Sharpness? Dynamic
>>>> range?
>>>> 
>>>> Maybe the best option is to finish doing all my slides and negatives 
>>>> with
>>>> the Coolscan for archival and quick-reference purposes, but to do a copy
>>>> with the macro for printmaking purposes.
>>>> 
>>>> Is your Leica 100 mm macro the old Macro-Elmar? I have one of these from
>>>> the 1970s on the bellows rig. I figure to use it with the R-to-M 
>>>> adapter on
>>>> my M240. That sounds like essentially the same important parts ? lens 
>>>> and
>>>> sensor ? as your kit with the SL. Does the Nikon slide copier actually 
>>>> fit
>>>> the 100 mm macro?s barrel or did you have to do something creative? And 
>>>> is
>>>> the Nikon ES-1 slide copy attachment the one you?re using?
>>>> 
>>>> ?howard
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 9, 2017, at 1:25 PM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Howard,
>>>>> 
>>>>> That's what I'm working on.  So far, the digital with the macro wins
>>>> every
>>>>> time.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Tina
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Howard L Ritter Jr <hlritter at 
>>>>> twc.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Has anyone seen/done a comparison between the Nikon Coolscan 5000 and 
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> slide-copier attachment with a good macro lens?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ?howard
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2017, at 12:23 PM, Tina Manley <tmanley at gmail.com> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I bought Nikon's attachment from B&H to use with my Leica R 100 
>>>>>>> Macro.
>>>>>> It's ready to go but I'm using the SL for horse photos right now.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hope to "scan" some Kodachrome with it later.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Tina
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2017, at 10:48 AM, Aram <leica_r8 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> https://petapixel.com/2012/12/23/why-you-should-digitize-
>>>>>> your-film-using-a-camera-instead-of-a-scanner/
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I have been experimenting with my Novoflex bellows with film
>>>> attachment
>>>>>> and have found similar results over my old Minolta Dimage film 
>>>>>> scanner.
>>>>>> Sharper and faster using my D750.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I see Nikon has introduced a film scanner attachment along with the
>>>>>> D850.  Looks cool and is not too expensive, if you already own a macro
>>>> lens.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Aram
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Aram Langhans
>>>>>>>> (Semi) Retired Science Teacher
>>>>>>>> & Unemployed photographer
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> ?The Human Genome Project has proved Darwin more right than Darwin
>>>>>> himself would ever have dared dream.? James D. Watson
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Tina Manley
>>>>> www.tinamanley.com
>>>>> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
>>>>> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-
>>>> 4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Tina Manley
>>> www.tinamanley.com
>>> tina-manley.artistwebsites.com
>>> http://www.alamy.com/stock-photography/3B49552F-90A0-4D0A-A11D-2175C937AA91/Tina+Manley.html
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from leica_r8 at hotmail.com (Aram) ([Leica] Interesting article on digitizing film)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Interesting article on digitizing film)
Message from hlritter at twc.com (Howard L Ritter Jr) ([Leica] Interesting article on digitizing film)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Interesting article on digitizing film)
Message from hlritter at twc.com (Howard L Ritter Jr) ([Leica] Interesting article on digitizing film)
Message from tmanley at gmail.com (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Interesting article on digitizing film)
Message from ric at cartersxrd.net (RicCarter) ([Leica] Interesting article on digitizing film)
Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] Interesting article on digitizing film)